Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH V2 11/11] x86: tsc: avoid system instability in hibernation

["Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 10:50 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 1:43 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 11:43:18AM +0000, Singh, Balbir wrote:
> > > For your original comment, just wanted to clarify the following:
> > >
> > > 1. After hibernation, the machine can be resumed on a different but 
> > > compatible
> > > host (these are VM images hibernated)
> > > 2. This means the clock between host1 and host2 can/will be different
> > >
> > > In your comments are you making the assumption that the host(s) is/are the
> > > same? Just checking the assumptions being made and being on the same page 
> > > with
> > > them.
> >
> > I would expect this to be the same problem we have as regular suspend,
> > after power off the TSC will have been reset, so resume will have to
> > somehow bridge that gap. I've no idea if/how it does that.
>
> In general, this is done by timekeeping_resume() and the only special
> thing done for the TSC appears to be the tsc_verify_tsc_adjust(true)
> call in tsc_resume().

And I forgot about tsc_restore_sched_clock_state() that gets called
via restore_processor_state() on x86, before calling
timekeeping_resume().

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel