[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH] sched: print information about scheduler granularity
On 16.04.20 18:43, Dario Faggioli wrote: On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 09:33 +0100, Sergey Dyasli wrote:Currently it might be not obvious which scheduling mode is being used by the scheduler. Alleviate this by printing additional information about the selected granularity.I like the idea. However, I don't like how verbose and long that line becomes.Messages now look like these: 1. boot (XEN) [00089808f0ea7496] Using scheduler: SMP Credit Scheduler (credit) in core-scheduling mode 2. xl debug-keys r (XEN) [ 45.914314] Scheduler: SMP Credit Scheduler (credit) in 2- way core-scheduling modeWhat about adding an entry, just below these ones. Something looking like, for instance (both at boot and in the debug-key dump): "Scheduling granularity: cpu" (or "core", or "socket") Also--- a/xen/common/sched/cpupool.c +++ b/xen/common/sched/cpupool.c @@ -38,7 +38,35 @@ static cpumask_t cpupool_locked_cpus; static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cpupool_lock);static enum sched_gran __read_mostly opt_sched_granularity =SCHED_GRAN_cpu; -static unsigned int __read_mostly sched_granularity = 1; +static unsigned int __read_mostly sched_granularity; + +char *sched_gran_str(char *str, size_t size) +{ + char *mode = ""; + + switch ( opt_sched_granularity ) + { + case SCHED_GRAN_cpu: + mode = "cpu"; + break; + case SCHED_GRAN_core: + mode = "core"; + break; + case SCHED_GRAN_socket: + mode = "socket"; + break; + default: + ASSERT_UNREACHABLE(); + break; + } + + if ( sched_granularity ) + snprintf(str, size, "%u-way %s", sched_granularity, mode);I'm not sure about using the value of the enum like this. enum? sched_granularity holds the number of cpus per scheduling resource. opt_sched_granularity is the enum. E.g., in a system with 4 threads per core, enabling core scheduling granularity would mean having 4 vCPUs in the scheduling units. But this will still print "2-way core-scheduling", which I think would sound confusing. It would print "4-way", of course. So I'd just go with "cpu", "core" and "socket" strings. No, this is not a good idea. With e.g. smt=0 you'll be able to have "1-way core" which is much more informative than "core". Juergen
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |