[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 07/10] x86/shadow: the guess_wrmap() hook is needed for HVM only
On 18.04.2020 11:03, Tim Deegan wrote: > At 16:28 +0200 on 17 Apr (1587140897), Jan Beulich wrote: >> sh_remove_write_access() bails early for !external guests, and hence its >> building and thus the need for the hook can be suppressed altogether in >> !HVM configs. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> > >> @@ -366,6 +367,14 @@ int sh_validate_guest_entry(struct vcpu >> extern int sh_remove_write_access(struct domain *d, mfn_t readonly_mfn, >> unsigned int level, >> unsigned long fault_addr); >> +#else >> +static inline int sh_remove_write_access(struct domain *d, mfn_t >> readonly_mfn, >> + unsigned int level, >> + unsigned long fault_addr) >> +{ > > Can we have an ASSERT(!shadow_mode_refcounts(d)) here, please, > matching the check that would have made it a noop before? I've added one, but I find this quite odd in a !HVM build, where #define PG_refcounts 0 and #define paging_mode_refcounts(_d) (!!((_d)->arch.paging.mode & PG_refcounts)) Perhaps you're wanting this mainly for documentation purposes? Jan
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |