Re: PCI devices passthrough on Arm design proposal

[Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

On 17.07.2020 16:12, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 17/07/2020 14:59, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Personally I'd much
>> prefer if we didn't have two fundamentally different PCI implementations
>> in the tree. Perhaps some of what Arm wants or needs can actually
>> benefit x86 as well, but this requires sufficiently much code sharing
>> then.
> 
> Well, it would be nice to have similar implementations. But at the same 
> time, we have different constraint. For instance, dom0 may disappear in 
> the future on Arm.

And becoming independent of Dom0 in this regard would be a benefit to
x86 as well, I think, irrespective of whether dom0less is to become a
thing there, too.

Jan