[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [PATCH v7 7/9] common/domain: add a domain context record for shared_info...
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> > Sent: 26 August 2020 14:58 > To: Paul Durrant <paul@xxxxxxx> > Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Paul Durrant <pdurrant@xxxxxxxxxx>; Ian > Jackson > <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>; Andrew Cooper > <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>; George > Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>; Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>; Stefano > Stabellini > <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 7/9] common/domain: add a domain context record for > shared_info... > > On 18.08.2020 12:30, Paul Durrant wrote: > > v7: > > - Only restore vcpu_info and arch sub-structures for PV domains, to match > > processing of SHARED_INFO in xc_sr_restore_x86_pv.c > > Since you point out this original logic, ... > > > +static int load_shared_info(struct domain *d, struct domain_context *c) > > +{ > > + struct domain_shared_info_context ctxt; > > + size_t hdr_size = offsetof(typeof(ctxt), buffer); > > + unsigned int i; > > + int rc; > > + > > + rc = DOMAIN_LOAD_BEGIN(SHARED_INFO, c, &i); > > + if ( rc ) > > + return rc; > > + > > + if ( i ) /* expect only a single instance */ > > + return -ENXIO; > > + > > + rc = domain_load_data(c, &ctxt, hdr_size); > > + if ( rc ) > > + return rc; > > + > > + if ( ctxt.buffer_size > sizeof(shared_info_t) || > > + (ctxt.flags & ~DOMAIN_SAVE_32BIT_SHINFO) ) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + if ( ctxt.flags & DOMAIN_SAVE_32BIT_SHINFO ) > > + { > > +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > > + has_32bit_shinfo(d) = true; > > +#else > > + return -EINVAL; > > +#endif > > + } > > + > > + if ( is_pv_domain(d) ) > > + { > > + shared_info_t *shinfo = xmalloc(shared_info_t); > > + > > + rc = domain_load_data(c, shinfo, sizeof(*shinfo)); > > + if ( rc ) > > + { > > + xfree(shinfo); > > + return rc; > > + } > > + > > +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > > + if ( has_32bit_shinfo(d) ) > > + { > > + memcpy(&d->shared_info->compat.vcpu_info, > > + &shinfo->compat.vcpu_info, > > + sizeof(d->shared_info->compat.vcpu_info)); > > + memcpy(&d->shared_info->compat.arch, > > + &shinfo->compat.arch, > > + sizeof(d->shared_info->compat.vcpu_info)); > > + } > > + else > > + { > > + memcpy(&d->shared_info->native.vcpu_info, > > + &shinfo->native.vcpu_info, > > + sizeof(d->shared_info->native.vcpu_info)); > > + memcpy(&d->shared_info->native.arch, > > + &shinfo->native.arch, > > + sizeof(d->shared_info->native.arch)); > > + } > > +#else > > + memcpy(&d->shared_info->vcpu_info, > > + &shinfo->vcpu_info, > > + sizeof(d->shared_info->vcpu_info)); > > + memcpy(&d->shared_info->arch, > > + &shinfo->arch, > > + sizeof(d->shared_info->shared)); > > +#endif > > ... where does the rest of that logic (resetting of > arch.pfn_to_mfn_frame_list_list, evtchn_pending, evtchn_mask, and > evtchn_pending_sel) get done? Or why is it not needed anymore? The resetting logic is still in xc_sr_restore_x86_pv.c (see patch #6). It's going to need to stay there anyway to deal with older streams so I made it common to both cases; it seems slightly separate from restoring the shared info. Paul > > Jan
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |