Re: [PATCH 0/6] tools/include: adjustments to the population of xen/

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 10/09/2020 13:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
> While looking at what it would take to move around libelf/
> in the hypervisor subtree, I've run into this rule, which I
> think can do with a few improvements and some simplification.

I realise this might be a controversial move, but can we *please*
address this by removing our use of symlinking, rather than kicking the
problem down the road.

For header files in particular, there is no need to symlink at all. 
Some properly formed -I runes for the compiler will do the right thing,
and avoid all intermediate regeneration issues.

~Andrew