[PATCH v3 6/7] x86: limit amount of INT3 in IND_THUNK_*

[Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

There's no point having every replacement variant to also specify the
INT3 - just have it once in the base macro. When patching, NOPs will get
inserted, which are fine to speculate through (until reaching the INT3).

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
I also wonder whether the LFENCE in IND_THUNK_RETPOLINE couldn't be
replaced by INT3 as well. Of course the effect will be marginal, as the
size of the thunk will still be 16 bytes when including tail padding
resulting from alignment.
---
v3: Add comment.
v2: New.

--- a/xen/arch/x86/indirect-thunk.S
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/indirect-thunk.S
@@ -11,6 +11,9 @@
 
 #include <asm/asm_defns.h>
 
+/* Don't tranform the "ret" further down. */
+.purgem ret
+
 .macro IND_THUNK_RETPOLINE reg:req
         call 2f
 1:
@@ -24,12 +27,10 @@
 .macro IND_THUNK_LFENCE reg:req
         lfence
         jmp *%\reg
-        int3 /* Halt straight-line speculation */
 .endm
 
 .macro IND_THUNK_JMP reg:req
         jmp *%\reg
-        int3 /* Halt straight-line speculation */
 .endm
 
 /*
@@ -44,6 +45,8 @@ ENTRY(__x86_indirect_thunk_\reg)
         __stringify(IND_THUNK_LFENCE \reg), X86_FEATURE_IND_THUNK_LFENCE, \
         __stringify(IND_THUNK_JMP \reg),    X86_FEATURE_IND_THUNK_JMP
 
+        int3 /* Halt straight-line speculation */
+
         .size __x86_indirect_thunk_\reg, . - __x86_indirect_thunk_\reg
         .type __x86_indirect_thunk_\reg, @function
 .endm