Re: [PATCH 15/17] x86/shadow: drop SH_type_l2h_pae_shadow

[Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

On 22.01.2021 21:02, Tim Deegan wrote:
> At 17:31 +0100 on 22 Jan (1611336662), Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Because of this having been benign (due to none of the callback
>> tables specifying non-NULL entries there), wouldn't it make
>> sense to dimension the tables by SH_type_max_shadow + 1 only?
>> Or would you consider this too risky?
> 
> Yes, I think that would be fine, also changing '<= 15' to
> '<= SH_type_max_shadow'.  Maybe add a matching
> ASSERT(t <= SH_type_max_shadow) in shadow_hash_insert as well?

The latter (also for shadow_hash_delete()) would seem kind
of orthogonal to me, but for now I've put it in there.

Jan