Re: [ANNOUNCE] Xen 4.15 - call for notification/status of significant bugs

[Ian Jackson <iwj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [ANNOUNCE] Xen 4.15 - call for notification/status of 
significant bugs"):
> On 04.02.2021 13:12, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > OPEN ISSUES
> > -----------
...
> > I reviewed a thread about this and it is not clear to me where we are
> > with this.
> 
> I'm not sure Marek's "Xen crash after S3 suspend - Xen 4.13 and newer"
> falls in either of the two buckets.

I think this is not a regression. though ?  See my reply to Dario.
Unless it is worse in 4.15 than earlier releases I'm not inclined to
see it as a blocker.

> (since you're continuing with E. further down)
> 
> F. The almost-XSA "x86/PV: avoid speculation abuse through guest
> accessors" - the first 4 patches are needed to address the actual
> issue. The next 3 patches are needed to get the tree into
> consistent state again, identifier-wise. The remaining patches
> can probably wait.

Thanks.  I have made a note of this.

I have to allocate the letters or it'll be chaos :-).  I'm calling
this I.

Ian.