Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] docs/doxygen: doxygen documentation for grant_table.h

[Luca Fancellu <luca.fancellu@xxxxxxx>]

> On 29 Apr 2021, at 14:11, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On 29.04.2021 11:50, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>>> On 29 Apr 2021, at 10:04, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 28.04.2021 16:59, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>>>>> On 27 Apr 2021, at 14:57, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> On 26.04.2021 17:37, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>>>>>> @@ -120,24 +132,26 @@ typedef uint32_t grant_ref_t;
>>>>>> * [GST]: This field is written by the guest and read by Xen.
>>>>>> */
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -/*
>>>>>> - * Version 1 of the grant table entry structure is maintained purely
>>>>>> - * for backwards compatibility.  New guests should use version 2.
>>>>>> - */
>>>>>> #if __XEN_INTERFACE_VERSION__ < 0x0003020a
>>>>>> #define grant_entry_v1 grant_entry
>>>>>> #define grant_entry_v1_t grant_entry_t
>>>>>> #endif
>>>>>> +/**
>>>>>> + * Version 1 of the grant table entry structure is maintained purely
>>>>>> + * for backwards compatibility.  New guests should use version 2.
>>>>>> + */
>>>>> 
>>>>> In case I didn't say so already before - I think this would be a good
>>>>> opportunity to drop the comment pointing at v2. With v2 optionally
>>>>> unavailable altogether, this can't possibly be a generally valid
>>>>> course of action.
>>>> 
>>>> Could you explain me better that? Do you want to get rid of this comment?
>>> 
>>> Especially the second sentence is misleading. If new code used v2, it
>>> would not work on Xen with v2 support turned off.
>> 
>> Can you suggest what to write here? I’m not very familiar with this xen
>> Interface
> 
> I've sent a patch myself just a few seconds ago.

Hi Jan,

That’s great, I’m going to push the v4 for this serie soon, now that the 
comment is fixed,
I can include it in the docs too, do you agree?

Cheers,
Luca

> 
> Jan