[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] tests/xenstore: link in librt
- To: Ian Jackson <iwj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 14:35:43 +0200
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=P56ITVavRR7rAmONoTimKF5xpeKb2AXY2002iQih6cg=; b=NrSFKJQNFwuHeKljP+clDXjzOgPhYZFZiYecxzLFwyiosHPuB1BEG4qYDVL6qZrC1+oSTIaws+Iuisx1KY3mMPIXkW3DB3KUdaosr3nmguzsWLDWNwmLV6uXaoCw1vskaApu9uJl6KjmFFA2zkIrowe+yDXaouhTpgd5gbqUOTZHJfvfDcBk93FdWvYfo8LQnDJHZ0ZQAWPzwvioGzsn37UgxqYm+07jGCd9AK1D+ILsywIGWNIx+0zw/VRHJeboWnFWWo3KzzkxOUncDpDlRwB6mskbN/SiUSiQSsgM/JcEsjlqIEaZprfk47pSLf5RozgyxvSpSrJBiUKJmK73og==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=NV2/bHL7vCqGpdh6j3So8UaRPNm64BR4AR2Wal4hDfHPi39q2z1xoynxqWVDDwWMQviKlKAUHbyqWqhinPmVrg2bf+/KCbup3l97LokcfASeaYJT2HLX/gqdDGHw/v1h/rqMjsNA4c9sS4rkM8kYa96RyvM6sbVN6YeepmYPjkWCL180aMxBmk/Xfhdjmhe98imv66/gPwcyRHMSZiIbiiHIPq2T92lzpSM31gMP0Nnt4AWLZuau1kiDUSYAmTinUKVnivRd3LRZ/IaUMFUNbd4MO5/d9GBEo7RDlEgxlGweiKHxLzx3eUYaEA4gilzAAyIvwavXGpaBv5tQrIIq4g==
- Authentication-results: xen.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;xen.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
- Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 12:35:53 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 13.08.2021 13:09, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH] tests/xenstore: link in librt"):
>> On 12.08.2021 13:24, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>>> +LDFLAGS += -lrt
>>>
>>> Don't this unconditionally is definitely not right.
>>
>> Assuming you meant "Doing this ..." - why? If the concern is that
>> librt.so may needlessly get recorded in a DT_NEEDED entry, then I
>> can replace the early addition with a late
>>
>> LDFLAGS += -Wl,--as-needed -lc -lrt
>>
>> one.
>
> librt might not exist at all on some platforms.
Hmm, indeed. Do you have any suggestion then? Adding a ./configure
check is going to be beyond what I'd we willing to spend time on ...
Jan
|
