[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [PATCH] x86: correct asm() constraints when dealing with immediate selector values
asm() constraints need to fit both the intended insn(s) which the respective operands are going to be used with as well as the actual kind of value specified. "m" (alone) together with a constant, however, leads to gcc saying error: memory input <N> is not directly addressable while clang complains error: invalid lvalue in asm input for constraint 'm' And rightly so - in order to access a memory operand, an address needs to be specified to the insn. In some cases it might be possible for a compiler to synthesize a memory operand holding the requested constant, but I think any solution there would have sharp edges. If "m" alone doesn't work with constants, it is at best pointless (and perhaps misleading or even risky - the compiler might decide to actually pick "m" and not try very hard to find a suitable register) to specify it alongside "r". Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/amd.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/amd.c @@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ void __init detect_zen2_null_seg_behavio uint64_t base; wrmsrl(MSR_FS_BASE, 1); - asm volatile ( "mov %0, %%fs" :: "rm" (0) ); + asm volatile ( "mov %0, %%fs" :: "r" (0) ); rdmsrl(MSR_FS_BASE, base); if (base == 0) --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/traps.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/traps.c @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ void do_double_fault(struct cpu_user_reg console_force_unlock(); - asm ( "lsll %1, %0" : "=r" (cpu) : "rm" (PER_CPU_SELECTOR) ); + asm ( "lsll %1, %0" : "=r" (cpu) : "r" (PER_CPU_SELECTOR) ); /* Find information saved during fault and dump it to the console. */ printk("*** DOUBLE FAULT ***\n");
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |