[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v1 04/14] xen/arm: Add support for PCI init to initialize the PCI driver.
Hi Julien, > On 7 Sep 2021, at 9:20 am, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Rahul, > > On 19/08/2021 13:02, Rahul Singh wrote: >> pci_init(..) will be called during xen startup to initialize and probe >> the PCI host-bridge driver. >> Signed-off-by: Rahul Singh <rahul.singh@xxxxxxx> >> --- >> xen/arch/arm/pci/pci.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> xen/include/asm-arm/device.h | 1 + >> 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+) >> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci.c b/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci.c >> index dc55d23778..d1c9cf997d 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci.c >> @@ -14,13 +14,67 @@ >> * along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. >> */ >> +#include <xen/acpi.h> >> +#include <xen/device_tree.h> >> +#include <xen/errno.h> >> +#include <xen/init.h> >> #include <xen/pci.h> >> +#include <xen/param.h> > > This include doesn't look to be necessary (yet?). Yes you are right this is not necessary .I will remove "param.h" > >> int arch_pci_clean_pirqs(struct domain *d) >> { >> return 0; >> } >> +static int __init dt_pci_init(void) >> +{ >> + struct dt_device_node *np; >> + int rc; >> + >> + dt_for_each_device_node(dt_host, np) >> + { >> + rc = device_init(np, DEVICE_PCI, NULL); >> + if( !rc ) >> + continue; >> + /* >> + * Ignore the following error codes: >> + * - EBADF: Indicate the current is not an pci >> + * - ENODEV: The pci device is not present or cannot be used by >> + * Xen. >> + */ >> + else if ( rc != -EBADF && rc != -ENODEV ) >> + { >> + printk(XENLOG_ERR "No driver found in XEN or driver init >> error.\n"); >> + return rc; >> + } >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI >> +static void __init acpi_pci_init(void) >> +{ >> + printk(XENLOG_ERR "ACPI pci init not supported \n"); >> + return; >> +} >> +#else >> +static inline void __init acpi_pci_init(void) { } >> +#endif >> + >> +static int __init pci_init(void) >> +{ >> + if ( acpi_disabled ) >> + dt_pci_init(); >> + else >> + acpi_pci_init(); >> + >> + pci_segments_init(); > > Shouldn't this happen before the PCI initialization? Calling pci_segment_init(..) before or after PCI initialization will not make any difference as this is independent call. Anyway I will move the pci_segment_init(..) before PCI initialization. Regards, Rahul
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |