[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] xen/arm: Setup MMIO range trap handlers for hardware domain
On Thu, 23 Sep 2021, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: > From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx> > > In order for vPCI to work it needs to maintain guest and hardware > domain's views on the configuration space. For example, BARs and ^ of > COMMAND registers require emulation for guests and the guest view > on the registers needs to be in sync with the real contents of the ^ of > relevant registers. For that ECAM address space needs to also be > trapped for the hardware domain, so we need to implement PCI host > bridge specific callbacks to properly setup MMIO handlers for those > ranges depending on particular host bridge implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx> The patch looks pretty good, only a couple of minor comments below > --- > Since v1: > - Dynamically calculate the number of MMIO handlers required for vPCI > and update the total number accordingly > - s/clb/cb > - Do not introduce a new callback for MMIO handler setup > --- > xen/arch/arm/domain.c | 2 ++ > xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > xen/arch/arm/vpci.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > xen/arch/arm/vpci.h | 6 ++++++ > xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h | 7 +++++++ > 5 files changed, 76 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c > index 854e8fed0393..c7b25bc70439 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c > @@ -733,6 +733,8 @@ int arch_domain_create(struct domain *d, > if ( (rc = domain_vgic_register(d, &count)) != 0 ) > goto fail; > > + count += domain_vpci_get_num_mmio_handlers(d); > + > if ( (rc = domain_io_init(d, count + MAX_IO_HANDLER)) != 0 ) > goto fail; > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c > b/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c > index 1567b6e2956c..155f2a2743af 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c > @@ -300,6 +300,34 @@ struct dt_device_node *pci_find_host_bridge_node(struct > device *dev) > } > return bridge->dt_node; > } > + > +int pci_host_iterate_bridges(struct domain *d, > + int (*cb)(struct domain *d, > + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)) > +{ > + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge; > + int err; > + > + list_for_each_entry( bridge, &pci_host_bridges, node ) > + { > + err = cb(d, bridge); > + if ( err ) > + return err; > + } > + return 0; > +} > + > +int pci_host_get_num_bridges(void) > +{ > + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge; > + int count = 0; > + > + list_for_each_entry( bridge, &pci_host_bridges, node ) > + count++; > + > + return count; > +} > + > /* > * Local variables: > * mode: C > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c > index 76c12b92814f..14947e975d69 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c > @@ -80,17 +80,50 @@ static const struct mmio_handler_ops vpci_mmio_handler = { > .write = vpci_mmio_write, > }; > > +static int vpci_setup_mmio_handler(struct domain *d, > + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge) > +{ > + struct pci_config_window *cfg = bridge->cfg; > + > + register_mmio_handler(d, &vpci_mmio_handler, > + cfg->phys_addr, cfg->size, NULL); > + return 0; > +} > + > int domain_vpci_init(struct domain *d) > { > if ( !has_vpci(d) ) > return 0; > > + if ( is_hardware_domain(d) ) > + return pci_host_iterate_bridges(d, vpci_setup_mmio_handler); > + > + /* Guest domains use what is programmed in their device tree. */ > register_mmio_handler(d, &vpci_mmio_handler, > GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_BASE, GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_SIZE, NULL); > > return 0; > } > > +int domain_vpci_get_num_mmio_handlers(struct domain *d) > +{ > + int count = 0; > + > + if ( is_hardware_domain(d) ) > + /* For each PCI host bridge's configuration space. */ > + count += pci_host_get_num_bridges(); NIT: why += instead of = ? > + else > + /* > + * VPCI_MSIX_MEM_NUM handlers for MSI-X tables per each PCI device > + * being passed through. Maximum number of supported devices > + * is 32 as virtual bus topology emulates the devices as embedded > + * endpoints. > + * +1 for a single emulated host bridge's configuration space. */ > + count = VPCI_MSIX_MEM_NUM * 32 + 1; > + > + return count; > +} > + > /* > * Local variables: > * mode: C > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h > index d8a7b0e3e802..27a2b069abd2 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h > @@ -17,11 +17,17 @@ > > #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_VPCI > int domain_vpci_init(struct domain *d); > +int domain_vpci_get_num_mmio_handlers(struct domain *d); > #else > static inline int domain_vpci_init(struct domain *d) > { > return 0; > } > + > +static inline int domain_vpci_get_num_mmio_handlers(struct domain *d) > +{ > + return 0; > +} > #endif > > #endif /* __ARCH_ARM_VPCI_H__ */ > diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h > index 5b100556225e..7618f0b6725b 100644 > --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h > @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ > #ifndef __ARM_PCI_H__ > #define __ARM_PCI_H__ > > +#include <asm/mmio.h> This should be no longer required. > #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_PCI > > #define pci_to_dev(pcidev) (&(pcidev)->arch.dev) > @@ -109,6 +111,11 @@ static always_inline bool > is_pci_passthrough_enabled(void) > { > return !!pci_passthrough_enabled; > } > + > +int pci_host_iterate_bridges(struct domain *d, > + int (*clb)(struct domain *d, > + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)); > +int pci_host_get_num_bridges(void); > #else /*!CONFIG_HAS_PCI*/ > > #define pci_passthrough_enabled (false)
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |