[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] xen/arm: Setup MMIO range trap handlers for hardware domain
On 25.09.21 03:18, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Thu, 23 Sep 2021, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: >> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx> >> >> In order for vPCI to work it needs to maintain guest and hardware >> domain's views on the configuration space. For example, BARs and > ^ of > Ack >> COMMAND registers require emulation for guests and the guest view >> on the registers needs to be in sync with the real contents of the > ^ of Ack > >> relevant registers. For that ECAM address space needs to also be >> trapped for the hardware domain, so we need to implement PCI host >> bridge specific callbacks to properly setup MMIO handlers for those >> ranges depending on particular host bridge implementation. >> >> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx> > The patch looks pretty good, only a couple of minor comments below > > >> --- >> Since v1: >> - Dynamically calculate the number of MMIO handlers required for vPCI >> and update the total number accordingly >> - s/clb/cb >> - Do not introduce a new callback for MMIO handler setup >> --- >> xen/arch/arm/domain.c | 2 ++ >> xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> xen/arch/arm/vpci.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> xen/arch/arm/vpci.h | 6 ++++++ >> xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h | 7 +++++++ >> 5 files changed, 76 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c >> index 854e8fed0393..c7b25bc70439 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c >> @@ -733,6 +733,8 @@ int arch_domain_create(struct domain *d, >> if ( (rc = domain_vgic_register(d, &count)) != 0 ) >> goto fail; >> >> + count += domain_vpci_get_num_mmio_handlers(d); >> + >> if ( (rc = domain_io_init(d, count + MAX_IO_HANDLER)) != 0 ) >> goto fail; >> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c >> b/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c >> index 1567b6e2956c..155f2a2743af 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c >> @@ -300,6 +300,34 @@ struct dt_device_node *pci_find_host_bridge_node(struct >> device *dev) >> } >> return bridge->dt_node; >> } >> + >> +int pci_host_iterate_bridges(struct domain *d, >> + int (*cb)(struct domain *d, >> + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)) >> +{ >> + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge; >> + int err; >> + >> + list_for_each_entry( bridge, &pci_host_bridges, node ) >> + { >> + err = cb(d, bridge); >> + if ( err ) >> + return err; >> + } >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +int pci_host_get_num_bridges(void) >> +{ >> + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge; >> + int count = 0; >> + >> + list_for_each_entry( bridge, &pci_host_bridges, node ) >> + count++; >> + >> + return count; >> +} >> + >> /* >> * Local variables: >> * mode: C >> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c >> index 76c12b92814f..14947e975d69 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c >> @@ -80,17 +80,50 @@ static const struct mmio_handler_ops vpci_mmio_handler = >> { >> .write = vpci_mmio_write, >> }; >> >> +static int vpci_setup_mmio_handler(struct domain *d, >> + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge) >> +{ >> + struct pci_config_window *cfg = bridge->cfg; >> + >> + register_mmio_handler(d, &vpci_mmio_handler, >> + cfg->phys_addr, cfg->size, NULL); >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> int domain_vpci_init(struct domain *d) >> { >> if ( !has_vpci(d) ) >> return 0; >> >> + if ( is_hardware_domain(d) ) >> + return pci_host_iterate_bridges(d, vpci_setup_mmio_handler); >> + >> + /* Guest domains use what is programmed in their device tree. */ >> register_mmio_handler(d, &vpci_mmio_handler, >> GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_BASE, GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_SIZE, >> NULL); >> >> return 0; >> } >> >> +int domain_vpci_get_num_mmio_handlers(struct domain *d) >> +{ >> + int count = 0; >> + >> + if ( is_hardware_domain(d) ) >> + /* For each PCI host bridge's configuration space. */ >> + count += pci_host_get_num_bridges(); > NIT: why += instead of = ? Will fix > > >> + else >> + /* >> + * VPCI_MSIX_MEM_NUM handlers for MSI-X tables per each PCI device >> + * being passed through. Maximum number of supported devices >> + * is 32 as virtual bus topology emulates the devices as embedded >> + * endpoints. >> + * +1 for a single emulated host bridge's configuration space. */ >> + count = VPCI_MSIX_MEM_NUM * 32 + 1; >> + >> + return count; >> +} >> + >> /* >> * Local variables: >> * mode: C >> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h >> index d8a7b0e3e802..27a2b069abd2 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h >> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h >> @@ -17,11 +17,17 @@ >> >> #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_VPCI >> int domain_vpci_init(struct domain *d); >> +int domain_vpci_get_num_mmio_handlers(struct domain *d); >> #else >> static inline int domain_vpci_init(struct domain *d) >> { >> return 0; >> } >> + >> +static inline int domain_vpci_get_num_mmio_handlers(struct domain *d) >> +{ >> + return 0; >> +} >> #endif >> >> #endif /* __ARCH_ARM_VPCI_H__ */ >> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h >> index 5b100556225e..7618f0b6725b 100644 >> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h >> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h >> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ >> #ifndef __ARM_PCI_H__ >> #define __ARM_PCI_H__ >> >> +#include <asm/mmio.h> > This should be no longer required. I'll check and remove > > >> #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_PCI >> >> #define pci_to_dev(pcidev) (&(pcidev)->arch.dev) >> @@ -109,6 +111,11 @@ static always_inline bool >> is_pci_passthrough_enabled(void) >> { >> return !!pci_passthrough_enabled; >> } >> + >> +int pci_host_iterate_bridges(struct domain *d, >> + int (*clb)(struct domain *d, >> + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)); >> +int pci_host_get_num_bridges(void); >> #else /*!CONFIG_HAS_PCI*/ >> >> #define pci_passthrough_enabled (false) Thank you, Oleksandr
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |