|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] xen/arm: Setup MMIO range trap handlers for hardware domain
On 25.09.21 03:18, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx>
>>
>> In order for vPCI to work it needs to maintain guest and hardware
>> domain's views on the configuration space. For example, BARs and
> ^ of
>
Ack
>> COMMAND registers require emulation for guests and the guest view
>> on the registers needs to be in sync with the real contents of the
> ^ of
Ack
>
>> relevant registers. For that ECAM address space needs to also be
>> trapped for the hardware domain, so we need to implement PCI host
>> bridge specific callbacks to properly setup MMIO handlers for those
>> ranges depending on particular host bridge implementation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx>
> The patch looks pretty good, only a couple of minor comments below
>
>
>> ---
>> Since v1:
>> - Dynamically calculate the number of MMIO handlers required for vPCI
>> and update the total number accordingly
>> - s/clb/cb
>> - Do not introduce a new callback for MMIO handler setup
>> ---
>> xen/arch/arm/domain.c | 2 ++
>> xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> xen/arch/arm/vpci.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> xen/arch/arm/vpci.h | 6 ++++++
>> xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h | 7 +++++++
>> 5 files changed, 76 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
>> index 854e8fed0393..c7b25bc70439 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
>> @@ -733,6 +733,8 @@ int arch_domain_create(struct domain *d,
>> if ( (rc = domain_vgic_register(d, &count)) != 0 )
>> goto fail;
>>
>> + count += domain_vpci_get_num_mmio_handlers(d);
>> +
>> if ( (rc = domain_io_init(d, count + MAX_IO_HANDLER)) != 0 )
>> goto fail;
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c
>> b/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c
>> index 1567b6e2956c..155f2a2743af 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c
>> @@ -300,6 +300,34 @@ struct dt_device_node *pci_find_host_bridge_node(struct
>> device *dev)
>> }
>> return bridge->dt_node;
>> }
>> +
>> +int pci_host_iterate_bridges(struct domain *d,
>> + int (*cb)(struct domain *d,
>> + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge))
>> +{
>> + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry( bridge, &pci_host_bridges, node )
>> + {
>> + err = cb(d, bridge);
>> + if ( err )
>> + return err;
>> + }
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int pci_host_get_num_bridges(void)
>> +{
>> + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge;
>> + int count = 0;
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry( bridge, &pci_host_bridges, node )
>> + count++;
>> +
>> + return count;
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * Local variables:
>> * mode: C
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c
>> index 76c12b92814f..14947e975d69 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c
>> @@ -80,17 +80,50 @@ static const struct mmio_handler_ops vpci_mmio_handler =
>> {
>> .write = vpci_mmio_write,
>> };
>>
>> +static int vpci_setup_mmio_handler(struct domain *d,
>> + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
>> +{
>> + struct pci_config_window *cfg = bridge->cfg;
>> +
>> + register_mmio_handler(d, &vpci_mmio_handler,
>> + cfg->phys_addr, cfg->size, NULL);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> int domain_vpci_init(struct domain *d)
>> {
>> if ( !has_vpci(d) )
>> return 0;
>>
>> + if ( is_hardware_domain(d) )
>> + return pci_host_iterate_bridges(d, vpci_setup_mmio_handler);
>> +
>> + /* Guest domains use what is programmed in their device tree. */
>> register_mmio_handler(d, &vpci_mmio_handler,
>> GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_BASE, GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_SIZE,
>> NULL);
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +int domain_vpci_get_num_mmio_handlers(struct domain *d)
>> +{
>> + int count = 0;
>> +
>> + if ( is_hardware_domain(d) )
>> + /* For each PCI host bridge's configuration space. */
>> + count += pci_host_get_num_bridges();
> NIT: why += instead of = ?
Will fix
>
>
>> + else
>> + /*
>> + * VPCI_MSIX_MEM_NUM handlers for MSI-X tables per each PCI device
>> + * being passed through. Maximum number of supported devices
>> + * is 32 as virtual bus topology emulates the devices as embedded
>> + * endpoints.
>> + * +1 for a single emulated host bridge's configuration space. */
>> + count = VPCI_MSIX_MEM_NUM * 32 + 1;
>> +
>> + return count;
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * Local variables:
>> * mode: C
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h
>> index d8a7b0e3e802..27a2b069abd2 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h
>> @@ -17,11 +17,17 @@
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_VPCI
>> int domain_vpci_init(struct domain *d);
>> +int domain_vpci_get_num_mmio_handlers(struct domain *d);
>> #else
>> static inline int domain_vpci_init(struct domain *d)
>> {
>> return 0;
>> }
>> +
>> +static inline int domain_vpci_get_num_mmio_handlers(struct domain *d)
>> +{
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> #endif
>>
>> #endif /* __ARCH_ARM_VPCI_H__ */
>> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h
>> index 5b100556225e..7618f0b6725b 100644
>> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h
>> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
>> #ifndef __ARM_PCI_H__
>> #define __ARM_PCI_H__
>>
>> +#include <asm/mmio.h>
> This should be no longer required.
I'll check and remove
>
>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_PCI
>>
>> #define pci_to_dev(pcidev) (&(pcidev)->arch.dev)
>> @@ -109,6 +111,11 @@ static always_inline bool
>> is_pci_passthrough_enabled(void)
>> {
>> return !!pci_passthrough_enabled;
>> }
>> +
>> +int pci_host_iterate_bridges(struct domain *d,
>> + int (*clb)(struct domain *d,
>> + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge));
>> +int pci_host_get_num_bridges(void);
>> #else /*!CONFIG_HAS_PCI*/
>>
>> #define pci_passthrough_enabled (false)
Thank you,
Oleksandr
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |