Re: [xen-unstable test] 164996: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Jackson <iwj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [xen-unstable test] 164996: regressions - FAIL"):
> Ian, for your setting up of a one-off flight (as just talked about),
> you can find the patch at
> https://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2021-09/msg01691.html
> (and perhaps in your mailbox). In case that's easier I've also attached
> it here.
...
> [DELETED ATTACHMENT linux-5.15-rc2-xen-privcmd-mmap-kvcalloc.patch, plain 
> text]

Thanks.  The attachment didn't git-am but I managed to make a tree
with it in (but a bogus commit message).

I have a repro of 165218 test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-raw (that's the last
xen-unstable flight) running.  If all goes well it will rebuild Linux
from my branch (new flight 165241) and then run the test using that
kernel (new flight 165242).  I have told it to report to the people on
this thread (and the list).

It will probably report in an hour or two (since it needs to rebuild a
kernel and then negotiate to get a host to run the repro on).
I didn't ask it to keep the host for me, but it ought to publish the
logs and as I say, send an email report here.

Ian.

For my reference:

./mg-transient-task ./mg-repro-setup -P -E...,iwj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,... 165218 
test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-raw X --rebuild 
+linux=https://xenbits.xen.org/git-http/people/iwj/linux.git#164996-fix 
alloc:equiv-rochester