[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] xen/arm: Check for PMU platform support



Hi Michal,

On 11/10/2021 10:00, Michal Orzel wrote:
ID_AA64DFR0_EL1/ID_DFR0_EL1 registers provide
information about PMU support. Replace structure
dbg64/dbg32 with a union and fill in all the
register fields according to document:
ARM Architecture Registers(DDI 0595, 2021-06).

Add macros boot_dbg_feature64/boot_dbg_feature32
to check for a debug feature. Add macro
cpu_has_pmu to check for PMU support.

Signed-off-by: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx>
---
Changes since v3:
-none
Changes since v2:
-none
Changes since v1:
-new in v2
---
  xen/include/asm-arm/cpufeature.h | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/cpufeature.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/cpufeature.h
index 5ca09b0bff..4fce23844d 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/cpufeature.h
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_64
  #define cpu_feature64(c, feat)         ((c)->pfr64.feat)
  #define boot_cpu_feature64(feat)       (system_cpuinfo.pfr64.feat)
+#define boot_dbg_feature64(feat)       (system_cpuinfo.dbg64.feat)
#define cpu_feature64_has_el0_32(c) (cpu_feature64(c, el0) == 2) @@ -22,6 +23,7 @@ #define cpu_feature32(c, feat) ((c)->pfr32.feat)
  #define boot_cpu_feature32(feat)       (system_cpuinfo.pfr32.feat)
+#define boot_dbg_feature32(feat)       (system_cpuinfo.dbg32.feat)
#define cpu_has_arm (boot_cpu_feature32(arm) == 1)
  #define cpu_has_thumb     (boot_cpu_feature32(thumb) >= 1)
@@ -32,8 +34,10 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_32
  #define cpu_has_gentimer  (boot_cpu_feature32(gentimer) == 1)
+#define cpu_has_pmu       (boot_dbg_feature32(perfmon) >= 1)

From my understanding, on Armv7, perfmon == 0 only means PMUv2 is not present. IOW, it doesn't say whether PMUv1 is supported.

I think it is OK to treat as the PMU is not supported (ARMv8 treat it like that too), but I would like a comment in the code so it is clear this is a deliberate choice.

  #else
  #define cpu_has_gentimer  (1)
+#define cpu_has_pmu       (boot_dbg_feature64(pmu_ver) >= 1)
  #endif
  #define cpu_has_security  (boot_cpu_feature32(security) > 0)
@@ -181,8 +185,28 @@ struct cpuinfo_arm {
          };
      } pfr64;
- struct {
+    union {
          register_t bits[2];
+        struct {
+            /* DFR0 */
+            unsigned long debug_ver:4;
+            unsigned long trace_ver:4;
+            unsigned long pmu_ver:4;
+            unsigned long brps:4;
+            unsigned long __res0:4;
+            unsigned long wrps:4;
+            unsigned long __res1:4;
+            unsigned long ctx_cmps:4;
+            unsigned long pms_ver:4;
+            unsigned long double_lock:4;
+            unsigned long trace_filt:4;
+            unsigned long __res2:4;
+            unsigned long mtpmu:4;
+            unsigned long __res3:12;
+
+            /* DFR1 */
+            unsigned long __res4:64;
+        };
      } dbg64;
struct {
@@ -321,8 +345,29 @@ struct cpuinfo_arm {
          };
      } pfr32;
- struct {
+    union {
          register_t bits[2];
+        struct {
+            /* DFR0 */
+            unsigned long copdbg:4;
+            unsigned long copsdbg:4;
+            unsigned long mmapdbg:4;
+            unsigned long coptrc:4;
+            unsigned long mmaptrc:4;
+            unsigned long mprofdbg:4;
+            unsigned long perfmon:4;
+            unsigned long tracefilt:4;
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_64
+            unsigned long __res0:32;
+#endif
+
+            /* DFR1 */
+            unsigned long mtpmu:4;
+            unsigned long __res1:28;
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_64
+            unsigned long __res2:32;
+#endif
+        };
      } dbg32;
struct {


Cheers,

--
Julien Grall



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.