[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [XEN PATCH v7 20/51] build: avoid re-executing the main Makefile by introducing build.mk
- To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 18:07:18 +0100
- Authentication-results: esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none
- Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <iwj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 17:08:03 +0000
- Ironport-data: A9a23:EZDDK6qCOEcD4eqVOVbzTWGYToheBmKVYhIvgKrLsJaIsI4StFCzt garIBnXPqmPZGb1Ktt2bI3loBxV7JaBn9NjG1ZurytjFC8WoJuZCYyVIHmrMnLJJKUvbq7GA +byyDXkBJppJpMJjk71atANlZT4vE2xbuKU5NTsY0idfic5Dnd84f5fs7Rh2Ncx2YHgW1nlV e7a+KUzBnf0g1aYDUpMg06zgEsHUCPa4W5wUvQWPJinjXeG/5UnJMt3yZKZdhMUdrJ8DO+iL 9sv+Znilo/vE7XBPfv++lrzWhVirrc/pmFigFIOM0SpqkAqSiDfTs/XnRfTAKtao2zhojx/9 DlCncztZUA1M7HqorQ6biUBUHluJqxWwbCSdBBTseTLp6HHW37lwvEoB0AqJ4wIvO1wBAmi9 9RBdmpLNErawbvrnvTrEYGAhex6RCXvFIoZpnFnyyCfFfs8SIrPa67L+cVZzHE7gcUm8fP2O pZFNmU+NU+ojxtnA2YnOsIiu+GSvUbQLzRkqgiL5pAl/D2GpOB2+Oe0a4eEEjCQfu1OhVqRr G/C+2X/AzkZOcaZxD7D9Wij7sfQmQvrVYRUE6e3ntZ6jVvWymENBRk+UVqgveL/mkO4Q8hYK UEf5mwpt6da3E6hQ8T5Xha4iGWZpRNaUN1Ve8U79wOl2qfS+xyeBGUPUnhGctNOnM0rQT0n0 HeZktWvAiZg2IB5UlrEqO3S92nrf3FIcylSPkfoUDfp/fGz/a10kh/TaOwzN5OJ156tCSrx0 wmF+X1Wa6ooseYH0KCy/Fbiij2qp4TUQgNd2jg7Tl5J/SsiO9b7P93ABUzzqK8adt7AHwbpU G0swpDGtIgz4YexeDthqQnnNIqi4OqZK3XiiFprEohJG9+FqiP7I944DN2TIi5U3ic4ld3BP B+7VeB5vsY70J6WgUlfOd/Z5yMCl/mIKDgdfqqIBueim7AoHON9wAlgZFSLw0fmm1U2nKc0N P+zKJj3ViZLUfs+lWboHI/xNIPHIAhlnws/orihnnyaPUe2PibJGd/pznPfBgzG0E90iFqMq IsOXyd74x5eTPf/ckHqHX07djg3wYwALcmu8aR/L7fbSiI/QT1JI6KBkNsJJt0+94wIx7igw 51IchIBoLYJrSacclvih7EKQO6HYKuTWlpiZXZyYg3yhyR6CWtthY9GH6YKkXAc3LQL5ZZJo zMtJ61s29xDFWbK/Sozd574oNAwfRinn1vWbSGkfCI+b9hrQAmQoo3oeQ7m9S8vCCurtJRh/ +38h12DGZdTFR5/CMv2ae60yw/jt3Yqh+8vDVDDJcNeeRuw/dEyeTDxlPI+P+oFNQ7HmmmBz w+TDBpB/bvNroY5/cPnn6eBq4v1QeJyElADRzvQ7KqsNDmc9W2mmNcSXOGNdDHbdWX15KT9O rkFk6CiaKUKxQ8YvZB9HrBnybMFy+Hu/7IKnB55GHjrbkiwDu8yKHexwsQS5LZGwaVUuFXqV xvXqMVaI7iAJOjsDEUVeFg+du2G2PwZxmvS4PAyLBmo7SN75uPaA0BbPh3Kgy1BNrpldogix L556sIR7gW+jDssM8qH0X8IpzjdcCRYXvV1rIweDa/qlhEvmwNLbpHrAyPr5I2CNodXOU4wL z7I3KfPitywHKYZn6bfwZQV4ddguA==
- Ironport-hdrordr: A9a23:9ihxTq/v9VnXaLTg9khuk+DcI+orL9Y04lQ7vn2ZLiYlFfBw9v re+MjzsCWetN9/Yh0dcLy7V5VoIkm9yXcW2+cs1N6ZNWGN1VdAR7sC0aLShxHmBi3i5qp8+M 5bAs1D4QTLfDtHZBDBkWuFL+o=
- Ironport-sdr: vuYowbn4SKJ/EzlYOZblaQwdvIzobTs9XGsOPmMognUvPkWkIlha/b9/5rCzHvA4wufHBIQcml HP4UHRY4LHb/j2eskCleynPvDwJ+UhxEF7s/zrOO14ZubhsNfN1RvkjH1x79mPL4gPUtsjTJtn TMG7SBjsLB9/gpoyl8vI3tFGCn/LC33k4srgDylDvhKxIsVHEW8dw5kg6h7sBuy5xG5cGoWgIM EMgbjFwahk7iSpVWhHm0GP7LgqhygZdOS+yL+AbveTY/zyklndyhoq8LxNHfXnV48ng8Kyqn8u LRgJ3vnXX9zlj4JrEiXXqxGY
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 05:31:08PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 11.10.2021 16:58, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 12:56:54PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 24.08.2021 12:50, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> >>> With nearly everything needed to move to "build.mk" moved, there is a
> >>> single dependency left from "Rules.mk": $(TARGET), which is moved to
> >>> the main Makefile.
> >>
> >> I'm having trouble identifying what this describes. Searching for
> >> $(TARGET) in the patch doesn't yield any obvious match. Thinking
> >> about it, do you perhaps mean the setting of that variable? Is
> >> moving that guaranteed to not leave the variable undefined? Or in
> >> other words is there no scenario at all where xen/Makefile might
> >> get bypassed? (Aiui building an individual .o, .i, or .s would
> >> continue to be fine, but it feels like something along these lines
> >> might get broken.)
> >
> > I mean that "xen/Rules.mk" will never "include" "xen/Makefile" after
> > this patch, but the variable "TARGET" is only set in "xen/Rules.mk". But
> > "xen/Makefile" still needs "TARGET" to be set so I moved the assignment
> > of the variable from "xen/Rules.mk" into "xen/Makefile".
>
> Okay, thanks, this confirms the understanding I had developed; maybe
> you try to reword this some. What your reply doesn't address is my
> question, though.
Which question, there seems to be 3 of them :-). Is it about
xen/Makefile been bypassed?
Building anything in xen/ requires to first execute xen/Makefile as this
is where variables like CFLAGS or XEN_ROOT are defined, and this
includes single builds or building an individual .o.
--
Anthony PERARD
|