|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: static-mem preventing dom0 from booting
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> The scenario is extremely simple; you can see the full device tree
> configuration in the attachment to my previous email.
>
> - dom0
> - dom0less domU with static-mem
>
> That's it! So basically it is just a normal dom0 + dom0less domU
> configuration, which already works fine, where I added static-mem to the
> domU and suddenly dom0 (not the domU!) stopped working.
I did some more debugging today and I found the problem. The issue is
that static-mem regions are added to the list of reserved_mem. However,
reserved_mem is automatically assigned to Dom0 by default at the bottom
of xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c:handle_node, see the second call to
make_memory_node. Really, we shouldn't give to dom0 static-mem ranges
meant for other domUs. E.g. the following change is sufficient to solve
the problem:
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
index 88a79247cb..dc609c4f0e 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
@@ -891,6 +891,9 @@ static int __init make_memory_node(const struct domain *d,
u64 start = mem->bank[i].start;
u64 size = mem->bank[i].size;
+ if ( mem->bank[i].xen_domain )
+ continue;
+
dt_dprintk(" Bank %d: %#"PRIx64"->%#"PRIx64"\n",
i, start, start + size);
However, maybe a better fix would be to purge reserved_mem of any
xen_domain items before calling make_memory_node.
I found one additional issue regarding is_domain_direct_mapped which
doesn't return true for static-mem domains. I think we need to add a
direct_map bool to arch_domain and set it for both dom0 and static-mem
dom0less domUs, so that we can change the implementation of
is_domain_direct_mapped to:
#define is_domain_direct_mapped(d) (d->arch.direct_map)
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |