[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v2.1 1/6][4.16?] x86/x2APIC: defer probe until after IOMMU ACPI table parsing
On 08.11.2021 12:54, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 12:40:59PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >> While commit 46c4061cd2bf ("x86/IOMMU: mark IOMMU / intremap not in use >> when ACPI tables are missing") deals with apic_x2apic_probe() as called >> from x2apic_bsp_setup(), the check_x2apic_preenabled() path is similarly >> affected: The call needs to occur after acpi_iommu_init(), such that >> iommu_intremap getting disabled there can be properly taken into account >> by apic_x2apic_probe(). >> >> Note that, for the time being (further cleanup patches following), >> reversing the order of the calls to generic_apic_probe() and >> acpi_boot_init() is not an option: >> - acpi_process_madt() calls clustered_apic_check() and hence relies on >> genapic to have got filled before, >> - generic_bigsmp_probe() (called from acpi_process_madt()) needs to >> occur after generic_apic_probe(), >> - acpi_parse_madt() (called from acpi_process_madt()) calls >> acpi_madt_oem_check(), which wants to be after generic_apic_probe(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, but testing again revealed a problem, this time on AMD. The dependencies are yet more complicated, so it'll need to be a mix of v1 and v2: acpi_iommu_init() needs to be split out, but generic_apic_probe() also needs to move. That's because _pci_hide_device() relies on dom_xen to have got set up before. Expect v2.2 after I have actually tested the outlined change. Jan
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |