[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [PATCH v2 0/8] x86emul: a few small steps towards disintegration
- To: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Henry Wang <Henry.Wang@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 07:31:20 +0000
- Accept-language: zh-CN, en-US
- Arc-authentication-results: i=2; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 63.35.35.123) smtp.rcpttodomain=lists.xenproject.org smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=armh.onmicrosoft.com; arc=pass (0 oda=1 ltdi=1 spf=[1,1,smtp.mailfrom=arm.com] dkim=[1,1,header.d=arm.com] dmarc=[1,1,header.from=arm.com])
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass header.d=arm.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=f7b1ELNsPHQzKLrMVcd7b8TftPA9NpV2UUza1FeAtlc=; b=YPq4eatGwnYdMb0z9Hv/XGgYrc9S4Gk2feiyKVtUkiM+ai6lHF21AkBDcJCRRD+TbmEqExdG1OsVjgfwuIPtOc/pizhn2fWZL4+/9mb9CGy5yiBS+Jm5DyRYJhVKb3QGrCcVd4Dkq3WwksVPSDbelx9fQrWoN+IeLSTJnDxQcM2dsAKoGVxieK/hh4RaOKZN/je15yhELNdwStVieoKUX1fMgybAR0nhCec8whHboEixlpW9rdrxU3HXne7Yhii5EDQJEjOov1uUSIvDXm3hWUmH1sCocukChK4s/G3/PVDz3x0PrULy/7sYsiQR+gr7LJbbiGIez2kXWbBEa0lffg==
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=f7b1ELNsPHQzKLrMVcd7b8TftPA9NpV2UUza1FeAtlc=; b=Mu0tPUt7oEslVz51CHkePlI1pPlisuxZGs0IyVsX8WNZ0+Y7oCC7/yaeKN9J7C4NUdqZ/oYTUNy3hrUuABKUHZjnKNasfzrGn2WojdfcI86qqCjqSau5MHnqHrv7junmenbyUAWC8MkFDiPOmDyEU95fz+Vgyp/PJAMOxFlXP7fO1CqqHo09GRIaUTu0K24pcFottBcU/kig0M1+N0ycqkWcIbNCn061j/xt4gDdtiFZN88RvhGnRR1KpuDMZUEzxD9SoLJK0jrqnl/vX2xnRWrUN5KYUGQ6zTfoqpEOosseti8+r139fMlePh40xAcnW8jKOel4asUPfzWIRRRZUg==
- Arc-seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=pass; b=USwZgIFYz9Nbllup+16eu6V0jYh2oq5y3Z1ymy4MdM6HcEQ/qZbA4889g0dQ2KRs/3gutgKglJ9A1f8pHze3DLNJZXATu2KlRSAsxIlm00v4oKYXp1RsBpmRjJ3bwdR2oTa4FDz/Q5DVACk25/8GXXmlGqdpFp8hbTYMM1rKCpE3MjVB6LeakgPuVuRpaNWu96er2tqSxRxhF5aEwzcSs4S5irVCxOU6Oyd/345oIcDxvEJaEeKdlOIwyUZSv8kS2cVNUFYln9anfmfi72enbMHJQR+rXL8EWn+9giG0ve1mi4RG6qBuNBCPxgDek5t2dfbYLMkZme1bK0LMmtAkaw==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=So9oIWIuf4Z6iklaR/WHxHMUT7FO1DZ4bH34uaDHXX43685EzLnvqBW4ZgtcZHSK4yGQ9tNwT4ajD96Fw6JPF+9NRNgQAS+t3obtdRJ0O5//iGc7MrlMTYkTuujDlmCewESbuQ7Dtn2aGmOuu1YC+sT3VEkJo82AO6oMmxLZA7ZuvhPoy7blKil0VmTtAsM31fo0Qzj7tyj2pG7aoZOgJoKLlEsYIIWGXqT1qreoZ8H0qw8qEz7H9ykGW1wlcu7LXxwYfq9jtxedmA1q0hPJWxwb8RSLBzhHqia5IJ3jZRzoudv/JEfa0fvpLJPp3yXrvjvkSNSXCqlWmr4INoZw1w==
- Authentication-results-original: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
- Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Wed, 06 Jul 2022 07:38:33 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
- Nodisclaimer: true
- Original-authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
- Thread-index: AQHYgJ6R51Cg7cLRXES97vjccXbkla1xEZQA
- Thread-topic: [PATCH v2 0/8] x86emul: a few small steps towards disintegration
Hi,
It seems that this series has been stale for nearly a month, with nothing heard
from maintainers. So I am sending this email as a gentle reminder for
maintainers.
Thanks!
Kind regards,
Henry
> -----Original Message-----
> Subject: [PATCH v2 0/8] x86emul: a few small steps towards disintegration
>
> ... of the huge monolithic source file. The series is largely code
> movement and hence has the intention of not incurring any functional
> change.
>
> It has now been almost a year since the v1 submission, without having
> had any feedback. Some re-basing was necessary in the meantime, and a
> new patch (the last one) has been added - even if seemingly unrelated,
> it was in this context where I did think of that possible adjustment
> (which may want to be viewed somewhat RFC, as I know there are
> reservations against the use of -Os).
>
> 1: split off opcode 0f01 handling
> 2: split off opcode 0fae handling
> 3: split off opcode 0fc7 handling
> 4: split off FPU opcode handling
> 5: split off insn decoding
> 6: move x86_emul_blk() to separate source file
> 7: move various utility functions to separate source files
> 8: build with -Os
>
> Jan
|
