[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] x86emul: a few small steps towards disintegration
- To: Henry Wang <Henry.Wang@xxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 11:05:19 +0200
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=ZTh3XsPykSP6dLgfEdVlwHZEw7elspkfNXKu1gQ6NcE=; b=NjJ5rpOk187tGyg0L+eeR8gZu7s1wQfs1rPkGISU7Wn4ML2Z+/1DNZ0KgQNK1ad1ifaiNR+gduNha4rntjidORRqUzIELrbot662kBeWC24chhaoT9ZXGHDb4jMK38y3EAaTgNaUFJ4fyM9ufagERzCWmLUirCfr6kLM/htJ0YgmmSeoQxULQKoaEuqzfnNbFcIpd9JfpX3Psb4eTtXPT5rem6M94t5FdpA2wiWj/T9GeuNKggpRHPkXBd0wz/mgctQLpl3L9gNrIc5eGDDozsOaAdAyfJwud+BCHmZPkKkX0/BJalyxuO5tpFgiwBBqMt0W1xjAKUszyOfkHQxaMQ==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Zgtc8Ih+QUBPPx1t0X1O+JZTQXr4PfsoyLPelVDD32wPoQVxTS/8DT6fkGBl3XycvnQVG0AIJNPLtrN2Djin+xEPl5udpRtkSbVIpvud2F4Q/A3SKoAcdaujlCpBXlepXXdZw+Tz285jk3J2HQrX6fGcil5pN5CCDnGe9S+NqjJNqxa7ddwCFQwfwvbIx/cu3Sw1g1RhzLHnl1jASPln0pJ6nwHdEdlnO1wRNdBxo0Ql8aEbh53JUme8FvWjqyxsbm+2i+N0doacgqmY+DLRMqjtDFjA1G4Z48cfrSqpVcYJcA3uWRYZ4t5qHflotdd84VmGoHwGhUk23vqh5k2UtA==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
- Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Wed, 06 Jul 2022 09:05:25 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 06.07.2022 09:31, Henry Wang wrote:
> It seems that this series has been stale for nearly a month, with nothing
> heard
> from maintainers. So I am sending this email as a gentle reminder for
> maintainers.
A month? That's only since v2 submission. See ...
>> -----Original Message-----
>> Subject: [PATCH v2 0/8] x86emul: a few small steps towards disintegration
>>
>> ... of the huge monolithic source file. The series is largely code
>> movement and hence has the intention of not incurring any functional
>> change.
>>
>> It has now been almost a year since the v1 submission, without having
>> had any feedback.
... here.
Jan
>> Some re-basing was necessary in the meantime, and a
>> new patch (the last one) has been added - even if seemingly unrelated,
>> it was in this context where I did think of that possible adjustment
>> (which may want to be viewed somewhat RFC, as I know there are
>> reservations against the use of -Os).
>>
>> 1: split off opcode 0f01 handling
>> 2: split off opcode 0fae handling
>> 3: split off opcode 0fc7 handling
>> 4: split off FPU opcode handling
>> 5: split off insn decoding
>> 6: move x86_emul_blk() to separate source file
>> 7: move various utility functions to separate source files
>> 8: build with -Os
>>
>> Jan
>
|
