[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Introducing a common representation of boot info
- To: Henry Wang <Henry.Wang@xxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 11:01:21 +0200
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=Fkv2XVwsr90t6HhOorncs2A8E2c5BJgYWjXcZMWvKBA=; b=iXlqA5cwMZ65iFEQeuAQZWmtezdrgDCivkre01ZnijhtbyjFtU31m7mXhFF67a6k5LNTlXss9JzAybbzkcWNKE1rhnDUWbfhvBVW6+F/htMjIvQegiAPF6iz2z4aREkaa9cpE6oI/QAZRiDoL+49FNnoTr+QdUDouxzmH4fyA7AjLI/3RFP29Hjw2fMYLCf+JV8mv6jcJ4iIJD3woBBnAnArc64+VEiao3Atdx9hS2VPyXDJVGWM84ESXuNhHls8q7GjBGUdtfXAeZjUx0ZNaEHguftyUwrpb55a/uuDtXEi07mnOo/XHFaNLaS69IIn+GNH6Xy3w0XQlwZrVj+cmg==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Ya7rxddcD8AndSZQThk3MXldrwA9DOJ3u51CZSY4Tkb8VzIsJXk9tIHbys2fdbAK+HsCJWtzFHQgla8wSiCQZ320iKTqxGJdsQDCbe98N7HS2wLiva4C/NZY3qpy0FqCdZFNdH0auCVIbac0IGLY2eZ6QCaGQZD2NcrG3lIzGMoVJEdiRT5ns39vZCrElF6jfm/wwFOUTxbPMm60YAt+V2bO973DizkcDCQLhrZ+vWxJLqtj1IN9nzvy22kSyRnXuJPKsxHZW/9O81Xr2/T+huwBDwFapnLKN1Os3mCWdo5l5l8wrkgj6TnqsJtkqt3Q83gQSWUO91amrh1zRu0jJw==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
- Cc: "scott.davis@xxxxxxxxxx" <scott.davis@xxxxxxxxxx>, "christopher.clark@xxxxxxxxxx" <christopher.clark@xxxxxxxxxx>, "sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx" <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Daniel P. Smith" <dpsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Wed, 06 Jul 2022 09:01:29 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 06.07.2022 09:30, Henry Wang wrote:
> It seems that this series has been stale for more than a month, with:
>
> Patch #1 has some discussions in thread.
> Patch #2 #3 #4 need some feedback from maintainers.
>
> So sending this email as a gentle reminder. Thanks!
As a general remark: RFCs, at least in my view, take lower priority than
"ordinary" patch submissions (and other work). I, for example, have this
and other on my "to look at" list, but I can't really predict when all
higher priority items would have been dealt with. It's the sad reality
that in effect this often means RFCs won't be looked at at all. One of
the many unfortunate effects of our limited review bandwidth.
Jan
|
