[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Introducing a common representation of boot info
- To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Henry Wang <Henry.Wang@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 09:28:28 +0000
- Accept-language: zh-CN, en-US
- Arc-authentication-results: i=2; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 63.35.35.123) smtp.rcpttodomain=lists.xenproject.org smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=armh.onmicrosoft.com; arc=pass (0 oda=1 ltdi=1 spf=[1,1,smtp.mailfrom=arm.com] dkim=[1,1,header.d=arm.com] dmarc=[1,1,header.from=arm.com])
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass header.d=arm.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=YG3rKQnfuoIiGc64LK+407lz5Kp6l6aLTewi2Sn8cvA=; b=KTMztUpFY6osEPBNX0kDD9R/d3YEV8td8m3+AQp03+DRxleOycYWOdvjAWEaMjecSiY18RXrGdWC0hkJOQVXoHE9krx5ibcEhbdq+F5QqcrVD57ltlxyceiATvinxzPagbCgcis1Cq+WZFnzZABay1V0tqdXZXgISgV94e24gGFL00keTlrDfPDiwsd9c6xcG8AumIp9SYjBnsikWvpvVeiPZu3uES8/AXarwO1tI/2UKW7zBSJv6OmS3VAUmeb5Rbb9qZ4kwJ28xbBgcz8bHmbrFg3ewNp12ILVx0cpYERWQatQuZDhnx7la3JmqzwZ9xXdxRx0les/fFcNBvZC0g==
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=YG3rKQnfuoIiGc64LK+407lz5Kp6l6aLTewi2Sn8cvA=; b=QS8ZEo1/SCmeBfEo87mi/0NwJEuKY1ztN5BJMl6of+YRSR3uuR8qWy8i9WKKYODpy/Oxo4Fngfv80ksVy1r1MrAQp11EponVVkQT3/2wvATH5oWBsHY4GpUL558LOLW08KXOFgAwLu4N0P7eDQuOERCPhDU8GxX/3gCahmVY3u1alqIfliZMFBasyABlz4olYfwoYcsdxL68NnJaB6wtqeldqNFCCaWoml0hhTC9DzYFzaW2EnKw8Ce2wJY0n7GiIyIRkLJ5z+B+DcOMSR7ade8p3/Wk40LvV8SJz8cffeSYMbQg6ALb0/sP9PMYHPnMayl6BjjhH8JNbbz5i8TK+Q==
- Arc-seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=pass; b=GBoX4P433jl/LFzmXxMlZJLg1/apEarHLfbvyKJ4pAj5npaNEObbEKy7jvMUQesurwx7gczOqaQt2l+xweDDbUfFsP7GfDq4sEJzw3oW2unBuy/fTVXveGlFHfKrFBKTSQIlDOn+1B4Q66VyScFFJ1eX3C838uGKKKalBuMFF5C2FuK786j1pvxwrdqfRf9pJP1FwsTEbi/SfT74SYTAU0pLy2Tqb4Y0gr2RWEWCOIklXgMMM0GjTuwrKRdDBD+1P4GHvtOJw3Wwi05lueeTpc+XGffdiWZee/Yi7gsgFmIzsKGUykMf2MHHbz7L1HzHBQ0jvgqmGQOVT2qWz8lAyg==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=hp16wDlj2vSeKUTEsFcVnW5Pti5uHF5R45zK5uU3nsrRiVsbFrIChYhXtMOEgNL08T+soI5dk3HfStmOdCjbF4NBU4AKe8zGKoVctUX4LeJ/OkYkWAQ4MKXEvo5NJFFUJvPaVXphE5bUcmImieJzTvqrkDLj1vyL6Qfo+Pd6h/csDlocjt5QWPkRwEAGJkgR9hEQ1b7qQKNzg6MDfQhsXQnxNpJ/oL5WICX6Tm2L7Pux/YLaKyd672c437JclVBQnQP5YWM5HuP4upX7PONZcGWWwJ6loflnGnrpPh++7joaaZwLKmKWFeeL6JTTygvCh3saxQma9sjJvN31Nv0wLQ==
- Authentication-results-original: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
- Cc: "scott.davis@xxxxxxxxxx" <scott.davis@xxxxxxxxxx>, "christopher.clark@xxxxxxxxxx" <christopher.clark@xxxxxxxxxx>, "sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx" <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Daniel P. Smith" <dpsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Wed, 06 Jul 2022 09:28:46 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
- Nodisclaimer: true
- Original-authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
- Thread-index: AQHYdHf6JvWZG2GXVE2XLLkq14FnwK1xI0fQgAAhtYCAAASccA==
- Thread-topic: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Introducing a common representation of boot info
Hi Jan,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Introducing a common representation of boot
> info
>
> On 06.07.2022 09:30, Henry Wang wrote:
> > It seems that this series has been stale for more than a month, with:
> >
> > Patch #1 has some discussions in thread.
> > Patch #2 #3 #4 need some feedback from maintainers.
> >
> > So sending this email as a gentle reminder. Thanks!
>
> As a general remark: RFCs, at least in my view, take lower priority than
> "ordinary" patch submissions (and other work). I, for example, have this
> and other on my "to look at" list, but I can't really predict when all
> higher priority items would have been dealt with. It's the sad reality
> that in effect this often means RFCs won't be looked at at all. One of
> the many unfortunate effects of our limited review bandwidth.
I fully agree with you on that, and to be honest I think you have already
Been really active in responding and reviewing series.
Just to clarify the purpose of me sending these reminder emails, from my
perspective, those emails are simply for us to not forget these series (and
also one of the responsibilities of me being a release manager) instead of
pushing authors/maintainers and making them feel stressful - I will try to
rephrase for better wording if my previously emails make people think in
this way.
Kind regards,
Henry
>
> Jan
|
