[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] x86/PV: correct post-preemption progress recording in iommu_memory_setup()

To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Andrew Cooper <amc96@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 11:44:13 +0100
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Paul Durrant <paul@xxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 10:44:19 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 27/07/2022 11:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Coverity validly points out that the mfn_add() as used was dead code.
>
> Coverity ID: 1507475
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] x86/PV: correct post-preemption progress recording in iommu_memory_setup()
  - From: Andrew Cooper

References:
- [PATCH] x86/PV: correct post-preemption progress recording in iommu_memory_setup()
  - From: Jan Beulich

Prev by Date: [PATCH] x86/PV: correct post-preemption progress recording in iommu_memory_setup()
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86/PV: correct post-preemption progress recording in iommu_memory_setup()
Previous by thread: [PATCH] x86/PV: correct post-preemption progress recording in iommu_memory_setup()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86/PV: correct post-preemption progress recording in iommu_memory_setup()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.