[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL
- To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Henry Wang <Henry.Wang@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 06:49:51 +0000
- Accept-language: zh-CN, en-US
- Arc-authentication-results: i=2; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 63.35.35.123) smtp.rcpttodomain=lists.xenproject.org smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=armh.onmicrosoft.com; arc=pass (0 oda=1 ltdi=1 spf=[1,1,smtp.mailfrom=arm.com] dkim=[1,1,header.d=arm.com] dmarc=[1,1,header.from=arm.com])
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass header.d=arm.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=gFZT/2iFchEk0DBkqTdx1ySupUUK19muxJpxMIblmmg=; b=FeERMrSs+KKqaja2hy3C1O8N9fzUMDz43vjjsbKJ2Yf55IklCXaWbI+p9fFJdpoJIAvGXcuxGWuGqMfKLZ3EoXICgBdADbt6smpoP38fMb3GB0r9KMNOhcO5c9e6E9TgbV3Rqo9WyXdLOLZs7fXn6oQpl8TqXps4AcP1+jnhgHhY0kQGHD19XfmGKB0uAWsgGWcaL1HG/wdVS/8jQk6C+4iYRaDxRJLvppOtEVa87uHf49fvKb3yLUpKbi1HgMBa62MQCGe/isbIZ8cUgjsC07rHAfH2DuYYLmEHnuRwlaxQEO+lzlXw649ur76lF+kVdjKn3KUDhOmc7LtVKHpLjw==
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=gFZT/2iFchEk0DBkqTdx1ySupUUK19muxJpxMIblmmg=; b=gQUSVfZzrAwA32HeAoryIMiPlHUfe72pK83ueht+MEOiKnI577T17SlZa9MUb6WYIPPFxsI5PEH4asrZwc7ltAOIg894TWwovOWVIS84+iv4MM8/8cUq6yF4YtRFJygQ+Do0lXHpTfdHhcbGuokfJaTCkubuBV7kqZNAGPnEMX0QLAXkgA+porg9MkcYVvXCGz81/73vmjZNmJB65bvZblamtBSS53dFghvMdNYwW6IiA5YTa//s6hb3UmJVetnKXO0QiHgZr93sacnqHQEnYLcd0y/SYnp/qyn5DQecQBHJqFj+5FbO66At4oHjyVcJjGzU8HMgkLL+NPLNvQPAiQ==
- Arc-seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=pass; b=igjpYCZELz9t9oOiyOJkMhNnYZqAxAvAreiQ6F363AAy2ZG0+yIhssztgHcZF8SHJP3FOW2/Mo+Bqv1kzGntP1PwOn8w/PQ3gFMBvlBVExNw5K/3sHTL5cWy5lDwNDyf/G/9zrwbWN2SYKJmEMxgwZajJCknlYC1LaVxVyrixnLDE5Bia25yweLO1EY7IhBgudAh7tbvzr1b76hYSK+JlHZrK23Sr36o+NiOepscWLpZ2Z/Fo/zRszbO2GbuXV/Tg8uJkjFctk+ki2+BBjczHk7dZ2YxGeYTYE+MaY3eVbcvQ1d8GMSOpF4Df5R8Kc1TcoUIVuQhBhrpG7gX83U21A==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=QIJlDXHd6VQb0Vv3H0149xk/Jpje/eNrcn808ctHEyBJh19UY63jjQ9FKherGywvoOJrN4VccYtWq+9niTxHCzn/NngCgC7JXbJcpA9FCFCZRGXOFZO5EkI2iJr7+GYqAUvEkP3jkk+Ivo3yKDuE8R6kvgNrbStopOog0z9Su8rJjbS3iz0dCouHFIA4drax5SUXLaoaiZsN4zZa1tTUdXJTJ3/3hXnPuf8koYSFaKwqSiK0rGegze32jRIr8hzWphHRDwo0SG6uvBUKcx33cCZ2+OThhzuhTaHZXzM6DMvrLLGvOXdJLBoz2tMaGrp//2JL1j2BGkaOlRzB4CDq6Q==
- Authentication-results-original: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
- Cc: Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@xxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, "sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx" <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, osstest service owner <osstest-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 06:50:11 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
- Nodisclaimer: true
- Original-authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
- Thread-index: AQHY3dQtFH1xMEjYXEqV6So1jL4Dp64KChlggABBzQCAAANfQIAAAkgAgAAAMNA=
- Thread-topic: [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL
Hi Jan,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL
>
> On 12.10.2022 08:42, Henry Wang wrote:
> > Hi Jan,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: Re: [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL
> >>
> >> On 12.10.2022 04:42, Henry Wang wrote:
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> Subject: [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL
> >>>>
> >>>> flight 173498 xen-4.15-testing real [real]
> >>>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/173498/
> >>>>
> >>>> Regressions :-(
> >>>
> >>> I think these regressions are from the backporting happened yesterday,
> >>> see below...
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> >>>> including tests which could not be run:
> >>>> build-arm64 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs.
> >>>> 172547
> >>>> build-arm64-xsm 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs.
> >>>> 172547
> >>>> build-amd64 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs.
> >>>> 172547
> >>>> build-armhf 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs.
> >>>> 172547
> >>>
> >>> ...The arm/arm64 regression is from the backporting of commit:
> >>> xen/arm, libxl: Implement XEN_DOMCTL_shadow_op for Arm
> >>>
> >>> The issue is:
> >>> In 4.16, commit
> >>> 2107cc76db3a libxc: split xc_logdirty_control() from xc_shadow_control()
> >>> changes the prototype of xc_shadow_control(), and hence the calling of
> >>> xc_shadow_control() in 4.13, 4.14 and 4.15 does not match the calling of
> >>> xc_shadow_control() in 4.16 and after.
> >>
> >> So did I commit a wrong patch, or were the patches for the older branches
> >> wrong already in xsa.git?
> >
> > I think the latter. For this commit I think the patch for master branch was
> picked
> > for the 4.13-4.15 backporting, without noticing the xc_shadow_control()
> > prototype change in 4.16.
> >
> > I can send a fix for this. If we don't want to backport the
> > "libxc: split xc_logdirty_control() from xc_shadow_control()"
>
> I don't think we should backport that extra change, but Anthony would have
> the final say.
Then I will try to prepare a fix.
Kind regards,
Henry
>
> Jan
|
