[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] xen/arm: p2m: Populate pages for GICv2 mapping in arch_domain_create()





On 13/10/2022 10:40, Henry Wang wrote:
Hi Andrew,

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/arm: p2m: Populate pages for GICv2 mapping in
arch_domain_create()

On 13/10/2022 09:38, Henry Wang wrote:
Hardware using GICv2 needs to create a P2M mapping of 8KB GICv2 area
when the domain is created. Considering the worst case of page tables
and keep a buffer, populate 16 pages as the default value to the P2M
pages pool in arch_domain_create() at the domain creation stage to
satisfy the GICv2 requirement.

Fixes: cbea5a1149ca ("xen/arm: Allocate and free P2M pages from the P2M
pool")
Suggested-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Henry Wang <Henry.Wang@xxxxxxx>
---
This should also be backported to 4.13, 4.14, 4.15 and 4.16.
---
  xen/arch/arm/domain.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
index 2c84e6dbbb..e40e2bcba1 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
@@ -740,6 +740,20 @@ int arch_domain_create(struct domain *d,
          BUG();
      }

+    spin_lock(&d->arch.paging.lock);
+    /*
+     * Hardware using GICv2 needs to create a P2M mapping of 8KB GICv2
area
+     * when the domain is created. Considering the worst case for page
+     * tables and keep a buffer, populate 16 pages to the P2M pages pool
here.
+     */
+    if ( (rc = p2m_set_allocation(d, 16, NULL)) != 0 )
+    {
+        p2m_set_allocation(d, 0, NULL);
+        spin_unlock(&d->arch.paging.lock);
+        goto fail;
+    }
+    spin_unlock(&d->arch.paging.lock);

Generally, this would be better written as

spin_lock();
if ( rc = p2m_set_allocation(16) )
     p2m_set_allocation(0)
spin_unlock();

if ( rc )
     goto fail;

to reduce the number of spin_unlock() calls and make the error paths
more clear.  However...

I think in Arm's arch_domain_create(), all the error handling are the
same style using:

if ( (rc = <function>) !=0 )
     goto fail;

and we need to keep them the same?

We don't have too. I agree with Andrew's point. How about the following:

spin_lock()
rc = ...
spin_unlock()

if ( rc )
  goto fail;

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.