[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] automation: introduce a dom0less test run on Xilinx hardware
- To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 10:25:21 +0000
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=citrix.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=citrix.com; dkim=pass header.d=citrix.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=mKaD0CLrMZ6aX2Z3CEuXe/uO4dawKUVAmhZZrz1Qul0=; b=Ga0xeTA9G/kYYo0TXK4+FQW6BOya62vh6WHIM1s4wh3AnZKsrykYK7AlHHWaHn833lJcb2ejEShimJ5aCTeDAaXNT2WjGxex/mqy6iusRcVznb/kEVn/8kY78ZP9XFd4IUcnuf01cHeZ64f/fyLeAzbbFeIySkf/vlzpCI6NxYboJGP4kV+nh5N/CdEHRWY6ZnY49affJ0omQRTJl0BXJYku3LxM0LXG2oqVEzZEmemHDyy2Z2xkL94Kcw8KnkZxcl7L1L5SA0X937ZA8uyqzM1V/WNy3bk57EPEUJbScaxdD3iDPKJiVYNgmuWIK1r8L0JYUSxnCbFZwjA7hjEa1g==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=CGOr2Gw1kvJB+Xo2i59tI2wJz9cp4O5E3xo7Eg+eYb+GMpbVUaqL7gFluloQIKfPoqTf2d6U/sHqwG6tlLtDmKBYuHIsaYUU/fRnRi8RoVjc55SZlA92WbxPTqrIGnD3oxbftFD2XpAP068pIFo85BRJDQfnRnVm+aGdf4Gbd6uS4n965Ch3Sj0OBA06BeFW0eFOgwqjHKZ1/JnXzCIzJmOlX9JM58IuFdBW1cET39rN91W9pMGWT75bwkECG3G8gGvIqjQE3bYf9G3VhweoRssnv9THGM8O7pJEIEYl8cCnbqrR999On4BXQI0qs1BtWphh+cZl7NQClocree44GA==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=citrix.com;
- Cc: cardoe@xxxxxxxxxx, michal.orzel@xxxxxxx, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Mon, 06 Mar 2023 10:25:42 +0000
- Ironport-data: A9a23:ycqNhKkt7o9eS4g9ALRtMgvo5gxhJ0RdPkR7XQ2eYbSJt1+Wr1Gzt xJOXmjQO6zZZWXxeNgkb4zk9B9SvMLTzdM2TgFkpSw9ECMWpZLJC+rCIxarNUt+DCFhoGFPt JxCN4aafKjYaleG+39B55C49SEUOZmgH+a6U6icfHgqH2eIcQ954Tp7gek1n4V0ttawBgKJq LvartbWfVSowFaYCEpNg064gE4p7aSaVA8w5ARkPqgQ5AGGzhH5MbpETU2PByqgKmVrNrbSq 9brlNmR4m7f9hExPdKp+p6TnpoiG+O60aCm0xK6aoD66vRwjnVaPpUTbZLwXXx/mTSR9+2d/ f0W3XCGpaXFCYWX8AgVe0Ew/yiTpsSq8pefSZS0mZT7I0Er7xIAahihZa07FdRwxwp5PY1B3 dofcy0AT0Cfu+27zpyyU9VKoectCfC+aevzulk4pd3YJdAPZMmbBonvu5pf1jp2gd1SF/HDY cZfcSBocBnLfxxIPBEQFY46m+CrwHL4dlW0qnrM/fZxvzeVkVw3ieC2WDbWUoXiqcF9t0CUv G/ZuU/+BQkXLoe3wjuZ6HO8wOTImEsXXapDROHmqKM13jV/wEQ2OTcmbQee/8Wpj2m6RdFOK X5O6yox+P1aGEuDC4OVsweDiGWfohcWVt5UEus7wAKA0KzZ50CeHGdsZi5MbpkqudE7QRQu1 0SVhJX5CDp3qrqXRHmBsLCOoluaMiEPIWgPTSQNVwcC7p/op4RbphfORdZqFOiylM/4HRn5x jzMpy87750IkcMF3qO8u0vbijihopzISA8d7wDbGGmi62tEiJWNYoWp7R3X6KhGJYPAFl2Z5 iFcwI6Z8fwECoyLmGqVWuIREbq15vGDdjrBnVpoGJpn/DOok5K+Qb1tDPhFDB8BGq45lfXBO Sc/ZSs5CEdvAUaX
- Ironport-hdrordr: A9a23:1z/kW6xoUSVskEY4i45kKrPwPb1zdoMgy1knxilNoH1uH/Bw8v rE9sjzuiWE6wr5J0tQ++xoVJPvfZq+z/JICOsqXYtKNTOO0FdAR7sM0WKN+Vzd8iTFh4tg6Z s=
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 03/03/2023 11:57 pm, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> + only:
> + variables:
> + - $XILINX_JOBS == "true" && $CI_COMMIT_REF_PROTECTED == "true"
We don't want to protect every branch of a tree that only a select
number of people can push to, nor (for this, or others configured with
the runner), want to impose branching conventions on them.
In all anticipated cases, those able to push would also be able to
reconfigure the protected-ness of branches, so this doesn't gain us any
security I don't think, but it certainly puts more hoops in the way to
be jumped through.
~Andrew
|
