[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v2] hvc/xen: prevent concurrent accesses to the shared ring
Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 01:36:48PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 12:40:05PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 05:08:06PM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >> > > On Wed, 30 Nov 2022, Roger Pau Monne wrote: >> > > > The hvc machinery registers both a console and a tty device based on >> > > > the hv ops provided by the specific implementation. Those two >> > > > interfaces however have different locks, and there's no single locks >> > > > that's shared between the tty and the console implementations, hence >> > > > the driver needs to protect itself against concurrent accesses. >> > > > Otherwise concurrent calls using the split interfaces are likely to >> > > > corrupt the ring indexes, leaving the console unusable. >> > > > >> > > > Introduce a lock to xencons_info to serialize accesses to the shared >> > > > ring. This is only required when using the shared memory console, >> > > > concurrent accesses to the hypercall based console implementation are >> > > > not an issue. >> > > > >> > > > Note the conditional logic in domU_read_console() is slightly modified >> > > > so the notify_daemon() call can be done outside of the locked region: >> > > > it's an hypercall and there's no need for it to be done with the lock >> > > > held. >> > > >> > > For domU_read_console: I don't mean to block this patch but we need to >> > > be sure about the semantics of hv_ops.get_chars. Either it is expected >> > > to be already locked, then we definitely shouldn't add another lock to >> > > domU_read_console. Or it is not expected to be already locked, then we >> > > should add the lock. >> > > >> > > My impression is that it is expected to be already locked, but I think >> > > we need Greg or Jiri to confirm one way or the other. >> > >> > Let me move both to the 'To:' field then. >> > >> > My main concern is the usage of hv_ops.get_chars hook in >> > hvc_poll_get_char(), as it's not obvious to me that callers of >> > tty->poll_get_char hook as returned by tty_find_polling_driver() will >> > always do so with the tty lock held (in fact the only user right now >> > doesn't seem to hold the tty lock). >> > >> > > Aside from that the rest looks fine. > > I guess I could reluctantly remove the lock in the get_chars hook, > albeit I'm not convinced at all the lock is not needed there. I don't know the xen driver, but other HVC backends have a lock around their private state in their get_chars() implementations. See eg. hvterm_raw_get_chars(). cheers
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |