[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [BUG] x2apic broken with current AMD hardware
On 20.03.2023 09:14, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 17.03.2023 18:26, Elliott Mitchell wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 09:22:09AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 16.03.2023 23:03, Elliott Mitchell wrote: >>>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 08:01:02AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 11.03.2023 01:09, Elliott Mitchell wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 10:03:23AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In any event you will want to collect a serial log at maximum verbosity. >>>>>>> It would also be of interest to know whether turning off the IOMMU >>>>>>> avoids >>>>>>> the issue as well (on the assumption that your system has less than 255 >>>>>>> CPUs). >>>>>> >>>>>> I think I might have figured out the situation in a different fashion. >>>>>> >>>>>> I was taking a look at the BIOS manual for this motherboard and noticed >>>>>> a mention of a "Local APIC Mode" setting. Four values are listed >>>>>> "Compatibility", "xAPIC", "x2APIC", and "Auto". >>>>>> >>>>>> That is the sort of setting I likely left at "Auto" and that may well >>>>>> result in x2 functionality being disabled. Perhaps the x2APIC >>>>>> functionality on AMD is detecting whether the hardware is present, and >>>>>> failing to test whether it has been enabled? (could be useful to output >>>>>> a message suggesting enabling the hardware feature) >>>>> >>>>> Can we please move to a little more technical terms here? What is >>>>> "present" >>>>> and "enabled" in your view? I don't suppose you mean the CPUID bit (which >>>>> we check) and the x2APIC-mode-enable one (which we drive as needed). It's >>>>> also left unclear what the four modes of BIOS operation evaluate to. Even >>>>> if we knew that, overriding e.g. "Compatibility" (which likely means some >>>>> form of "disabled" / "hidden") isn't normally an appropriate thing to do. >>>>> In "Auto" mode Xen likely should work - the only way I could interpret the >>>>> the other modes are "xAPIC" meaning no x2APIC ACPI tables entries (and >>>>> presumably the CPUID bit also masked), "x2APIC" meaning x2APIC mode pre- >>>>> enabled by firmware, and "Auto" leaving it to the OS to select. Yet that's >>>>> speculation on my part ... >>>> >>>> I provided the information I had discovered. There is a setting for this >>>> motherboard (likely present on some similar motherboards) which /may/ >>>> effect the issue. I doubt I've tried "compatibility", but none of the >>>> values I've tried have gotten the system to boot without "x2apic=false" >>>> on Xen's command-line. >>>> >>>> When setting to "x2APIC" just after "(XEN) AMD-Vi: IOMMU Extended >>>> Features:" >>>> I see the line "(XEN) - x2APIC". Later is the line >>>> "(XEN) x2APIC mode is already enabled by BIOS." I'll guess "Auto" >>>> leaves the x2APIC turned off since neither line is present. >>> >>> When "(XEN) - x2APIC" is absent the IOMMU can't be switched into x2APIC >>> mode. Are you sure that's the case when using "Auto"? >> >> grep -eAPIC\ driver -e-\ x2APIC: >> >> "Auto": >> (XEN) Using APIC driver default >> (XEN) Overriding APIC driver with bigsmp >> (XEN) Switched to APIC driver x2apic_cluster >> >> "x2APIC": >> (XEN) Using APIC driver x2apic_cluster >> (XEN) - x2APIC >> >> Yes, I'm sure. > > Okay, this then means we're running in a mode we don't mean to run > in: When the IOMMU claims to not support x2APIC mode (which is odd in > the first place when at the same time the CPU reports x2APIC mode as > supported), amd_iommu_prepare() is intended to switch interrupt > remapping mode to "restricted" (which in turn would force x2APIC mode > to "physical", not "clustered"). I notice though that there are a > number of error paths in the function which bypass this setting. Could > you add a couple of printk()s to understand which path is taken (each > time; the function can be called more than once)? I think I've spotted at least one issue. Could you give the patch below a try please? (Patch is fine for master and 4.17 but would need context adjustment for 4.16.) Jan AMD/IOMMU: without XT, x2APIC needs to be forced into physical mode An earlier change with the same title (commit 1ba66a870eba) altered only the path where x2apic_phys was already set to false (perhaps from the command line). The same of course needs applying when the variable wasn't modified yet from its initial value. Reported-by: Elliott Mitchell <ehem+xen@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> --- unstable.orig/xen/arch/x86/genapic/x2apic.c +++ unstable/xen/arch/x86/genapic/x2apic.c @@ -236,11 +236,11 @@ const struct genapic *__init apic_x2apic if ( x2apic_phys < 0 ) { /* - * Force physical mode if there's no interrupt remapping support: The - * ID in clustered mode requires a 32 bit destination field due to + * Force physical mode if there's no (full) interrupt remapping support: + * The ID in clustered mode requires a 32 bit destination field due to * the usage of the high 16 bits to hold the cluster ID. */ - x2apic_phys = !iommu_intremap || + x2apic_phys = iommu_intremap != iommu_intremap_full || (acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_APIC_PHYSICAL) || (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X2APIC_PHYSICAL) && !(acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_APIC_CLUSTER));
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |