[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] x86: extend coverage of HLE "bad page" workaround
- To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 16:58:24 +0100
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=citrix.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=citrix.com; dkim=pass header.d=citrix.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=TjRnAdKTnGMf8ytIdDz0drTY6lFbThODyVm2NRpa2Ns=; b=aA/vQVs01wnO0f69EJ3N3aWePMBzQKv/weHkQ2e8re0EEJ9rLy0Q92eMBVghLarY2vq9VRSrD42oylIV3CCaqM+qA0DGJDcr4jsJ7hgovi50oaGq2H+Kk5nSeDGNkA4qcvBcUhQ9Vk5a+irBSaepV/1CSftLC3ZgZo1Eob385RBH1VjQ8QAkGbcKYKvw22qG+Sa4qmeKK5/vYDOjTNRv+nWAcadn0tRtjYfBsx8Gaalbd3EG9zr+M7FOJWMHZr0pI6QSmIWvFHQl3a3+gZfT7DBkl039kkR6g1PGf0YHe/ug8hm1DMTjKzaU2ryNyGIOppi3xl+S8c8sDyPaAdZ+gA==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=YXU1CMVejM7Kn4QpqKVqbOFJwjEPpdx0MxuuCI/11BoXOIyIOKaf3uWV6kSxJaDjvqk7ZHspEOCCMD0ylCOBtb5du+/0Y8Yr81pcR6xuyC/fs99wAH+LP/hvCo0M6aaXqh56PfP7T7oNKJpphc+t+J2tLK/f9F2gUD/XDZ/lMhQJAGKy/QKphEHL6ALN3nG/epukJs4baTLTPzCmLFguYG32aG0xWA7nYb+PI9oXkJ3m1yellQ51hM3tyeizM/CaWnoeksk8AMbyTrG8tWUheujV/y76E4qLdds5xqx55JA5xG+LJ6u2YQTg/1bNS595tf+HBmcsOrTkGXbxnNvzhg==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=citrix.com;
- Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 15:58:55 +0000
- Ironport-data: A9a23:zx7KSKlnupa1lKGBvvw6EFLo5gynJ0RdPkR7XQ2eYbSJt1+Wr1Gzt xJOXWiPPPjZMWD2c412bonj9EkPupPSztMwGgptrHo3QiMWpZLJC+rCIxarNUt+DCFhoGFPt JxCN4aafKjYaleG+39B55C49SEUOZmgH+a6U6icfHgqH2eIcQ954Tp7gek1n4V0ttawBgKJq LvartbWfVSowFaYCEpNg064gE4p7aSaVA8w5ARkPqgQ5gaGzRH5MbpETU2PByqgKmVrNrbSq 9brlNmR4m7f9hExPdKp+p6TnpoiG+O60aCm0xK6aoD66vRwjnVaPpUTbZLwXXx/mTSR9+2d/ f0W3XCGpaXFCYWX8AgVe0Ew/yiTpsSq8pefSZS0mZT7I0Er7xIAahihZa07FdRwxwp5PY1B3 cAlFjwySQqCu9/177CVY8Axqvo8B+C+aevzulk4pd3YJdAPZMmaBo/stZpf1jp2gd1SF/HDY cZfcSBocBnLfxxIPBEQFY46m+CrwHL4dlW0qnrM/fZxvzeVkVw3iea8WDbWUoXiqcF9hEGXq 3iA523kKhobKMae2XyO9XfEaurnxHuiBt5JROHjnhJsqFuvnHUXChwqbASindiHk1S/C/h6C GVBr0LCqoB3riRHVOLVXRe1vXqFtR40QMdLHqsx7wTl4rrZ5UOVC3YJShZFacc6r4kmSDoyz FiLktj1Qzt1v9W9Vna15rqS6zSoNkAowXQqYCYFSU4P5YnlqYRq1xbXFI89Qeiyk8H/Hiz2z 3aSti8iir4PjMkNkaKm4VTAhDHqrZ/MJuIo2jjqsquexlsRTOaYi0aAszA3Md4owF6lc2S8
- Ironport-hdrordr: A9a23:alfhKqNA6NJn78BcTvejsMiBIKoaSvp037Dk7TEXdfUzSL3hqy nOpoVj6faQsl0ssR4b9exoVJPufZq+z+8X3WByB9aftWDd0QPDQb2Ki7GSoQEIcBeRygcy79 YFT4FOTPH2EFhmnYLbzWCDYrAdKaG8kJxAXN2uqktQcQ==
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 04:51:43PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 21.03.2023 15:42, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 08:49:52AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> Respective Core Gen10 processor lines are affected, too.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
> >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
> >> @@ -6045,6 +6045,8 @@ const struct platform_bad_page *__init g
> >> case 0x000506e0: /* errata SKL167 / SKW159 */
> >> case 0x000806e0: /* erratum KBL??? */
> >> case 0x000906e0: /* errata KBL??? / KBW114 / CFW103 */
> >> + case 0x000a0650: /* erratum Core Gen10 U/H/S 101 */
> >> + case 0x000a0660: /* erratum Core Gen10 U/H/S 101 */
> >
> > I think this is errata CML101, I would add that at the end of the
> > comment.
>
> Indeed in the current version of the document CML prefix exist. The older
> document I've been looking at has no such letter acronyms in front of the
> errata numbers. I can certainly update.
>
> > Also you seem to be missing the '806ec' model (806e0 case)? (listed as
> > 'U 4+2 V1')
>
> Isn't that pre-existing (see 2nd line of context above)?
Oh, indeed. Would you mind also adding a reference to CML101 for
0x000806e0 then?
Thanks, Roger.
|
