Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] PCI: Introduce pci_dev_for_each_resource()

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 10:02:38AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 04:30:01PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

...

> I poked around looking for similar patterns elsewhere with:
> 
>   git grep "#define.*for_each_.*_p("
>   git grep "#define.*for_each_.*_idx("
> 
> I didn't find any other "_p" iterators and just a few "_idx" ones, so
> my hope is to follow what little precedent there is, as well as
> converge on the basic "*_for_each_resource()" iterators and remove the
> "_idx()" versions over time by doing things like the
> pci_claim_resource() change.

The p is heavily used in the byte order conversion helpers.

> What do you think?  If it seems like excessive churn, we can do it
> as-is and still try to reduce the use of the index variable over time.

I think _p has a precedent as well. But I can think about it a bit, maybe
we can come up with something smarter.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko