[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 180072: regressions - trouble: fail/pass/starved
flight 180072 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] flight 180075 xen-unstable-smoke real-retest [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/180072/ http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/180075/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 180068 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm 15 migrate-support-check fail never pass test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm 16 saverestore-support-check fail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl 1 build-check(1) starved n/a build-armhf 2 hosts-allocate starved n/a version targeted for testing: xen 64c21916167e6269280929fab1202537b54b13cf baseline version: xen 12c5eea3ca6fa2674726d62cc9f369f81861d23f Last test of basis 180068 2023-03-30 16:01:56 Z 0 days Testing same since 180072 2023-03-30 20:00:24 Z 0 days 1 attempts ------------------------------------------------------------ People who touched revisions under test: Ayan Kumar Halder <ayan.kumar.halder@xxxxxxx> Julien Grall <jgrall@xxxxxxxxxx> jobs: build-arm64-xsm pass build-amd64 pass build-armhf starved build-amd64-libvirt pass test-armhf-armhf-xl starved test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 pass test-amd64-amd64-libvirt fail ------------------------------------------------------------ sg-report-flight on osstest.test-lab.xenproject.org logs: /home/logs/logs images: /home/logs/images Logs, config files, etc. are available at http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs Explanation of these reports, and of osstest in general, is at http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README.email;hb=master http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README;hb=master Test harness code can be found at http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary Not pushing. ------------------------------------------------------------ commit 64c21916167e6269280929fab1202537b54b13cf Author: Ayan Kumar Halder <ayan.kumar.halder@xxxxxxx> Date: Tue Mar 21 14:03:47 2023 +0000 xen/arm: Use the correct format specifier 1. One should use 'PRIpaddr' to display 'paddr_t' variables. However, while creating nodes in fdt, the address (if present in the node name) should be represented using 'PRIx64'. This is to be in conformance with the following rule present in https://elinux.org/Device_Tree_Linux . node names "unit-address does not have leading zeros" As 'PRIpaddr' introduces leading zeros, we cannot use it. So, we have introduced a wrapper ie domain_fdt_begin_node() which will represent physical address using 'PRIx64'. 2. One should use 'PRIx64' to display 'u64' in hex format. The current use of 'PRIpaddr' for printing PTE is buggy as this is not a physical address. Signed-off-by: Ayan Kumar Halder <ayan.kumar.halder@xxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@xxxxxxxxxx> (qemu changes not included)
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |