[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [XEN v5 07/10] xen/arm: Restrict zeroeth_table_offset for ARM_64
Hi, On 21/04/2023 09:03, Michal Orzel wrote: On 13/04/2023 19:37, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:When 32 bit physical addresses are used (ie PHYS_ADDR_T_32=y), "va >> ZEROETH_SHIFT" causes an overflow. Also, there is no zeroeth level page table on Arm32. Also took the opportunity to clean up dump_pt_walk(). One could use DECLARE_OFFSETS() macro instead of declaring the declaring an arrays/declaring the declaring/declaring/of page table offsets. Signed-off-by: Ayan Kumar Halder <ayan.kumar.halder@xxxxxxx>Reviewed-by: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx> Acked-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@xxxxxxxxxx> Cheers, -- Julien Grall
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |