[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 1/2] xen/x86/pvh: use preset XSDT header for XSDT generation
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 03:11:49PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Tue, 16 May 2023, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 10:10:07AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > > On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 05:16:27PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > > On Mon, 15 May 2023, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > > On 15.05.2023 10:48, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 06:17:19PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > > > >> From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxx> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Xen always generates a XSDT table even if the firmware provided a > > > > > >> RSDT > > > > > >> table. Instead of copying the XSDT header from the firmware table > > > > > >> (that > > > > > >> might be missing), generate the XSDT header from a preset. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxx> > > > > > >> --- > > > > > >> xen/arch/x86/hvm/dom0_build.c | 32 > > > > > >> +++++++++----------------------- > > > > > >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > > > > >> > > > > > >> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/dom0_build.c > > > > > >> b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/dom0_build.c > > > > > >> index 307edc6a8c..5fde769863 100644 > > > > > >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/dom0_build.c > > > > > >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/dom0_build.c > > > > > >> @@ -963,13 +963,18 @@ static int __init pvh_setup_acpi_xsdt(struct > > > > > >> domain *d, paddr_t madt_addr, > > > > > >> paddr_t *addr) > > > > > >> { > > > > > >> struct acpi_table_xsdt *xsdt; > > > > > >> - struct acpi_table_header *table; > > > > > >> - struct acpi_table_rsdp *rsdp; > > > > > >> const struct acpi_table_desc *tables = > > > > > >> acpi_gbl_root_table_list.tables; > > > > > >> unsigned long size = sizeof(*xsdt); > > > > > >> unsigned int i, j, num_tables = 0; > > > > > >> - paddr_t xsdt_paddr; > > > > > >> int rc; > > > > > >> + struct acpi_table_header header = { > > > > > >> + .signature = "XSDT", > > > > > >> + .length = sizeof(struct acpi_table_header), > > > > > >> + .revision = 0x1, > > > > > >> + .oem_id = "Xen", > > > > > >> + .oem_table_id = "HVM", > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this is wrong, as according to the spec the OEM Table ID > > > > > > must > > > > > > match the OEM Table ID in the FADT. > > > > > > > > > > > > We likely want to copy the OEM ID and OEM Table ID from the RSDP, > > > > > > and > > > > > > possibly also the other OEM related fields. > > > > > > > > > > > > Alternatively we might want to copy and use the RSDT on systems that > > > > > > lack an XSDT, or even just copy the header from the RSDT into Xen's > > > > > > crafted XSDT, since the format of the RSDP and the XSDT headers are > > > > > > exactly the same (the difference is in the size of the description > > > > > > headers that come after). > > > > > > > > > > I guess I'd prefer that last variant. > > > > > > > > I tried this approach (together with the second patch for necessity) and > > > > it worked. > > > > > > > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/dom0_build.c > > > > b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/dom0_build.c > > > > index fd2cbf68bc..11d6d1bc23 100644 > > > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/dom0_build.c > > > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/dom0_build.c > > > > @@ -967,6 +967,10 @@ static int __init pvh_setup_acpi_xsdt(struct > > > > domain *d, paddr_t madt_addr, > > > > goto out; > > > > } > > > > xsdt_paddr = rsdp->xsdt_physical_address; > > > > + if ( !xsdt_paddr ) > > > > + { > > > > + xsdt_paddr = rsdp->rsdt_physical_address; > > > > + } > > > > acpi_os_unmap_memory(rsdp, sizeof(*rsdp)); > > > > table = acpi_os_map_memory(xsdt_paddr, sizeof(*table)); > > > > if ( !table ) > > > > > > To be slightly more consistent, could you use: > > > > > > /* > > > * Note the header is the same for both RSDT and XSDT, so it's fine to > > > * copy the native RSDT header to the Xen crafted XSDT if no native > > > * XSDT is available. > > > */ > > > if (rsdp->revision > 1 && rsdp->xsdt_physical_address) > > > sdt_paddr = rsdp->xsdt_physical_address; > > > else > > > sdt_paddr = rsdp->rsdt_physical_address; > > > > > > It was an oversight of mine to not check for the RSDP revision, as > > > RSDP < 2 will never have an XSDT. Also add: > > > > > > Fixes: 1d74282c455f ('x86: setup PVHv2 Dom0 ACPI tables') > > > > Just realized this will require some more work so that the guest > > (dom0) provided RSDP is at least revision 2. You will need to adjust > > the field and recalculate the checksum if needed. > > But we are always providing RSDP version 2 in pvh_setup_acpi, right? Yes, as said in the reply to Jan, just ignore this. Thanks, Roger.
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |