[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v6 00/16] x86/mtrr: fix handling with PAT but without MTRR
On 11.05.23 18:32, Borislav Petkov wrote: On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 05:53:15PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:Urgh, yes, there is something missing: diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/generic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/generic.c index 031f7ea8e72b..9544e7d13bb3 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/generic.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/generic.c @@ -521,8 +521,12 @@ u8 mtrr_type_lookup(u64 start, u64 end, u8 *uniform) for (i = 0; i < cache_map_n && start < end; i++) { if (start >= cache_map[i].end) continue;So the loop will go through the map until...- if (start < cache_map[i].start) + if (start < cache_map[i].start) {... it reaches the first entry where that is true.type = type_merge(type, mtrr_state.def_type, uniform);the @type argument is MTRR_TYPE_INVALID, def_type is WRBACK so what this'll do is simply get you the default WRBACK type: type_merge: if (type == MTRR_TYPE_INVALID) return new_type;+ start = cache_map[i].start; + if (end <= start) + break;Now you break here because end <= start. Why? You can just as well do: if (start < cache_map[i].start) { /* region non-overlapping with the region in the map */ if (end <= cache_map[i].start) return type_merge(type, mtrr_state.def_type, uniform); ... rest of the processing ... In general, I get it that your code is slick but I want it to be maintainable - not slick. I'd like for when people look at this, not have to add a bunch of debugging output in order to swap the whole thing back into their brains. So mtrr_type_lookup() definitely needs comments explaining what goes where. You can send it as a diff ontop - I'll merge it. The attached diff is for patch 13. Juergen Attachment:
diff.patch Attachment:
OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |