[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: xentrace buffer size, maxcpus and online cpus
- To: Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 12:22:21 +0200
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=E5lcn+2XTbgHXexqj2IoBWoQ5eQ6w3EWi3tf2dAej1c=; b=Xj7Gkgk4k+nRDZPWnRL65EMFWnrkHThRH36rE+CxFOTO8xsHqf/FIKunYAjADhj72upiAlWOyHhIthwnwtLxKmttqyiQfr63ZHfkcLxZYeX5RbeiFFDD9COlQ36BgfKmpfEJg38JuxMTriTcEukQ/CFYmOpOSGV8CUUKMFAt6w1G/0c81oIwpY4652BCMdWRfp8LqFJfTGPa4Vdr6Z6nShc54qweAWlmZmS1o5Uia79F9oCcG+EriIB3tWNg1zdWbLIAEhI8EkLnTQE/ruFXfjmWC1UZhN9EYhcBQLgdDmRxUd2YCzUHbox0qphxhEzpLlxQ6TXpv2+3hN5ZVdVk6w==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=bnNkhtfQT6W7yaqI8874eKlVh+1Fs3iCT/s2nzuu/mjKfX2m6A6NdY5J/HZjgKq17VNLXJi5KON3OxrwPfOtvkdrO6fN8bZY4toItNN+VSHTW9qL/WUV3u53KjYbzIGXj02buxEjG1TrEow9IcUsrJBJNek3A+HAKcwe6osFKA4NaC5bCrL3YH+jq4A+zl9SlnLkJsEp755IoFo/9iwYF1txeygbpZT6zIqqgvgxYkAnDjaoGAfv4FJOfd2Z7DEDUc4KZYXO6EYpy3bxZqJgk5mnQHjSwXJYxH7tZTSAn5/ZU3+fReoJWnfwDKziBdXTh2HrNh1XbrxMnIbDfsifDw==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
- Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 10:22:37 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 19.06.2023 12:13, Olaf Hering wrote:
> Regarding coding style: can this_cpu and per_cpu be used as array index,
> or is a temporary variable required? This would affect the number of
> lines changed in next_record.
I see no reason why it shouldn't be possible to be used. At least as
long as overall line length doesn't make the result unwieldy. (It's
no different from a function call, in the end.)
Jan
|
