Re: [RFC 1/6] dom0: replace explict zero checks

[Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2 Aug 2023, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 02.08.2023 02:24, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Aug 2023, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
> >> --- a/xen/include/xen/sched.h
> >> +++ b/xen/include/xen/sched.h
> >> @@ -1058,6 +1058,13 @@ void scheduler_disable(void);
> >>  void watchdog_domain_init(struct domain *d);
> >>  void watchdog_domain_destroy(struct domain *d);
> >>  
> >> +static always_inline bool is_initial_domain(const struct domain *d)
> > 
> > I know you used always_inline only because is_hardware_domain just below
> > also uses it, but I wonder if we need it.
> > 
> > Also, Robero, it looks like always_inline is missing from
> > docs/misra/C-language-toolchain.rst? Or do we plan to get rid of it?
> 
> Under "Non-standard tokens" we have both __inline__ and __attribute__
> listed, which I think is enough to cover this specific case as well?

I think we should add always_inline explicitely to
docs/misra/C-language-toolchain.rst to avoid any doubts about it