[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 2/2] fdt: make fdt handling reusable across arch
- To: Henry Wang <Henry.Wang@xxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: "Daniel P. Smith" <dpsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 09:14:11 -0400
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=apertussolutions.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dpsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dmarc=pass header.from=<dpsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1691068457; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=hpa3gHQ2YUcIcsojKGTgCk04d0FhFq+N9GgsGAyqK0I=; b=MEJgOtORnusvNfn5amv0ALHqj9tW/X9av8s+JkKKuTAcOOT4HDkkwc6W0wG7S0c2lzAXUCPEHtkWqxP1Xr6rkP2guJmKFCK2kHtVVL1kRioxiz1s1FLk8i2WenpYN69UBuwT9o452WjNeAh7tSb2NDMS/G0twg4/TWsRXpU+j0s=
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1691068457; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=Q89MeVFSK8jwhtPdVQ1oDiTvVFk5wAQYSewss5+2mdtjkqUvtbUSTRTRwjqbotQv9N1b6ycmbFOr/xcDzLtdZKAMXDNUYQZLfFSYQFSMKeh1zQ6nr+GfLzJ60FLXUntRLL7AK5K+dUyQuvPLVPTJbiq+5G0gmhR+tSTFiUDTXek=
- Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 03 Aug 2023 13:14:25 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 8/2/23 21:40, Henry Wang wrote:
Hi Daniel,
-----Original Message-----
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fdt: make fdt handling reusable across arch
make: *** [Makefile:183: __sub-make] Error 2
make: Leaving directory '/jenkins/workspace/ais-xenbits-
xen/layers/xen/xen'
The staging itself passed the CI check. Did I miss some context to make
this patch works? Could you please provide some hints? Thanks in advance!
Nope you are correct, I now need to go back and look if I sent patches
out of the wrong branch or if I really did miss cleaning up the original
declarations in the Arm tree. I fairly confident I made sure gitlab-ci
passed before I cut the patches for sending,
I think so, as I saw something related to the Gitlab-CI runners discussion
in IRC yesterday.
but since I had three
different series in flight, I may have gotten jumbled. Apologies for the
unnecessary churn here.
No problem at all, I am more than happy to do the test for your
v2 series once it is in the mailing list :))
Great! Thank you!
v/r,
dps
|
