[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3] docs/misra: add rule 2.1 exceptions
- To: Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@xxxxxxx>, Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 10:23:49 +0200
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=9/2z2lQAkQSM711vYBkwkAdNACvaX+6fRshVne93eAA=; b=PozSFw3akZtgAC42POBHfIOyoTNQRWXwRrQU+xydqAAn43VO49NKj1iL9kSoFjD8udiAiR/ePsPbeTOKQkv6elbHuZNp75molkfao0Rr3in+l/fLoFALD25kACHcLa3eHYgSSbCfYzwNhRv7PG91nYNQgI9bFm9y/b1ThqI10RWTO8VuDprMYsEuX1qBntSo+lWR2LzQPwhU+Jalf6tfHX5Q5Grp2PnF4vkQQH4kRGCV5NUNQu2dQ51D3Op1fNa5xaw9IB5inus47NELuMqzX7QJEGCR/Mt1AhvSqGMJV75bwMkHFW702YnsF0Z+I5jFf15zKpxiLPBZQ2Hjb74+DA==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Twn44zZZS3fNKc13XoeVSYNExWI7dAJzLVVh+PJUVI7MIWMD+/TJrqyayALIjyZ9tccSv96IVkueqIKh0CVC92XmTbYbskEg90iTSMkcYIu5/K/Cngh7Tlm9BnoLp5B+/9buk2FC6/rxMt0dzjJZ9hcOM3VLBQW9RcRG7IA/DWnOGR5A0WEtpU26PUYONhVN5XCJgVm55NQY8Hv/x3OTSWJO/9e67A3EmNr+W3CxWZVxVbO2L9m+IPKzODhQI3v82t/LmeXjAgVunbHvGpkwUmnJG1nwE8bYJ3V2sgEYLjBmWc0WrONjOamqzYbz3Xj1/VvmVGQyeg6XvuI9hMDVeA==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
- Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx" <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, "roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx" <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, "george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx" <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, "roberto.bagnara@xxxxxxxxxxx" <roberto.bagnara@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "julien@xxxxxxx" <julien@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 08:23:59 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 27.09.2023 10:14, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>> On 27 Sep 2023, at 09:53, Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> My opinion is that it's far easier for this to be an eclair configuration
>> (which has the
>> advantage not to depend on the exact definition of unreachable) and then
>> perhaps a comment
>> above it explaining the situation.
>
> I agree here and it is easier to make an overall exception where we list the
> cases
> where this is acceptable (ie all flavors of unreacheable) and document that
> eclair
> was configured using "xxxx" to handle this.
What about cppcheck then, for example?
Jan
|
