[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [XEN PATCH][for-4.19 v2 3/8] xen/pdx: amend definition of PDX_GROUP_COUNT

To: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 16:33:01 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx, michal.orzel@xxxxxxx, xenia.ragiadakou@xxxxxxx, ayan.kumar.halder@xxxxxxx, consulting@xxxxxxxxxxx, jbeulich@xxxxxxxx, andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx, roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 23:33:08 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On Thu, 12 Oct 2023, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> The definition of PDX_GROUP_COUNT causes violations of
> MISRA C:2012 Rule 10.1, therefore the problematic part now uses
> the LOWEST_BIT macro, which encapsulates the pattern.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>

References:
- [XEN PATCH v2 0/8] address violations of MISRA C:2012 Rule 10.1
  - From: Nicola Vetrini
- [XEN PATCH][for-4.19 v2 3/8] xen/pdx: amend definition of PDX_GROUP_COUNT
  - From: Nicola Vetrini

Prev by Date: Re: [XEN PATCH][for-4.19 v2 2/8] arm/bitops: encapsulate violation of MISRA C:2012 Rule 10.1
Next by Date: Re: [XEN PATCH][for-next v2 4/8] x86_64/mm: express macro CNT using LOWEST_BIT
Previous by thread: [XEN PATCH][for-4.19 v2 3/8] xen/pdx: amend definition of PDX_GROUP_COUNT
Next by thread: [XEN PATCH][for-next v2 4/8] x86_64/mm: express macro CNT using LOWEST_BIT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.