[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [XEN PATCH][for-next v2 4/8] x86_64/mm: express macro CNT using LOWEST_BIT

To: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 16:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx, michal.orzel@xxxxxxx, xenia.ragiadakou@xxxxxxx, ayan.kumar.halder@xxxxxxx, consulting@xxxxxxxxxxx, jbeulich@xxxxxxxx, andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx, roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 23:35:11 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On Thu, 12 Oct 2023, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> The various definitions of macro CNT (and the related BUILD_BUG_ON)
> can be rewritten using LOWEST_BIT, encapsulating a violation of
> MISRA C:2012 Rule 10.1.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>

References:
- [XEN PATCH v2 0/8] address violations of MISRA C:2012 Rule 10.1
  - From: Nicola Vetrini
- [XEN PATCH][for-next v2 4/8] x86_64/mm: express macro CNT using LOWEST_BIT
  - From: Nicola Vetrini

Prev by Date: Re: [XEN PATCH][for-4.19 v2 3/8] xen/pdx: amend definition of PDX_GROUP_COUNT
Next by Date: Re: [XEN PATCH][for-next v2 6/8] x86/mce: Move MC_NCLASSES into the enum mctelem_class
Previous by thread: [XEN PATCH][for-next v2 4/8] x86_64/mm: express macro CNT using LOWEST_BIT
Next by thread: [XEN PATCH][for-next v2 5/8] x86/io_apic: address violation of MISRA C:2012 Rule 10.1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.