Re: [XEN PATCH v2 3/7] x86: add deviation comments for asm-only functions

[Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 17 Oct 2023, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > Jan, for this specific patch, I don't think we have the scan including
> > Intel vmx files yet. Nicola please correct me if I am wrong. So Nicola
> > wouldn't be able to easily expand this patch to also cover Intel vmx
> > violations of this rule because we don't have the list of violations
> > affecting those files. 
> 
> I'm afraid I disagree: There are likely direct VMX counterparts to the SVM
> items adjusted. No scan is needed to spot those. Anything VMX-only can be
> left separate, sure.

Nicola is new to the codebase, so let us help.

This patch adds deviations for these SVM functions:
- svm_intr_assist
- nsvm_vcpu_switch
- svm_vmenter_helper
- svm_vmexit_handler

I take these are the VMX equivalents:
- vmx_intr_assist
- nvmx_switch_guest
- vmx_vmenter_helper
- vmx_asm_vmexit_handler

Jan, did I miss anything?