Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] arm/dom0less: put dom0less feature code in a separate module

[Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Luca,

On 14/11/2023 10:03, Luca Fancellu wrote:
> 
> 
> Currently the dom0less feature code is mostly inside domain_build.c
> and setup.c, it is a feature that may not be useful to everyone so
> put the code in a different compilation module in order to make it
> easier to disable the feature in the future.
> 
> Move gic_interrupt_t in domain_build.h to use it with the function
> declaration, move its comment above the declaration.
> 
> The following functions are now visible externally from domain_build
> because they are used also from the dom0less-build module:
>  - get_allocation_size
>  - set_interrupt
>  - domain_fdt_begin_node
>  - make_memory_node
>  - make_resv_memory_node
>  - make_hypervisor_node
>  - make_psci_node
>  - make_cpus_node
>  - make_timer_node
>  - handle_device_interrupts
>  - construct_domain
>  - process_shm
>  - allocate_bank_memory
> 
> The functions allocate_static_memory and assign_static_memory_11
> are now externally visible, so put their declarations into
> domain_build.h and move the #else and stub definition in the header
> as well.
> 
> Move is_dom0less_mode from setup.c to dom0less-build.c and make it
> externally visible.
> 
> The function allocate_bank_memory is used only by dom0less code
> at the moment, but it's been decided to leave it in domain_build.c
> in case that in the future the dom0 code can use it.
> 
> Where spotted, fix code style issues.
> 
> No functional change is intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luca Fancellu <luca.fancellu@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>

with one remark...

> ---
> Changes from v4:
>  - fixed name in inclusion macro __ASM_* instead of __ARM_*, fixed
>    emacs local variable 'end:', style fix (Michal)
> Changes from v3:
>  - remove header in dom0less-build.c (Michal)
> Changes from v2:
>  - move allocate_bank_memory back in domain_build.c, remove header
>    from dom0less-build.c.
> ---
>  xen/arch/arm/Makefile                     |    1 +
>  xen/arch/arm/dom0less-build.c             | 1018 +++++++++++++++++
>  xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c               | 1265 +++------------------
>  xen/arch/arm/include/asm/dom0less-build.h |   20 +
>  xen/arch/arm/include/asm/domain_build.h   |   60 +
>  xen/arch/arm/include/asm/setup.h          |    1 -
>  xen/arch/arm/setup.c                      |   33 +-
>  7 files changed, 1240 insertions(+), 1158 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/dom0less-build.c
>  create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/include/asm/dom0less-build.h
> 

[...]
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/dom0less-build.h 
> b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/dom0less-build.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..81446cbd8bf3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/dom0less-build.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +
> +#ifndef __ASM_DOM0LESS_BUILD_H_
> +#define __ASM_DOM0LESS_BUILD_H_
> +
> +#include <asm/kernel.h>
No need for this include, especially if you are removing it in the subsequent 
patch.
This could be done on commit (+ there is a conflcit between your series and 
Henry's mmu/mpu split)

~Michal