[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] arm/dom0less: put dom0less feature code in a separate module
On 20/11/2023 07:34, Michal Orzel wrote: Hi Luca, On 14/11/2023 10:03, Luca Fancellu wrote:Currently the dom0less feature code is mostly inside domain_build.c and setup.c, it is a feature that may not be useful to everyone so put the code in a different compilation module in order to make it easier to disable the feature in the future. Move gic_interrupt_t in domain_build.h to use it with the function declaration, move its comment above the declaration. The following functions are now visible externally from domain_build because they are used also from the dom0less-build module: - get_allocation_size - set_interrupt - domain_fdt_begin_node - make_memory_node - make_resv_memory_node - make_hypervisor_node - make_psci_node - make_cpus_node - make_timer_node - handle_device_interrupts - construct_domain - process_shm - allocate_bank_memory The functions allocate_static_memory and assign_static_memory_11 are now externally visible, so put their declarations into domain_build.h and move the #else and stub definition in the header as well. Move is_dom0less_mode from setup.c to dom0less-build.c and make it externally visible. The function allocate_bank_memory is used only by dom0less code at the moment, but it's been decided to leave it in domain_build.c in case that in the future the dom0 code can use it. Where spotted, fix code style issues. No functional change is intended. Signed-off-by: Luca Fancellu <luca.fancellu@xxxxxxx>Reviewed-by: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx> with one remark...--- Changes from v4: - fixed name in inclusion macro __ASM_* instead of __ARM_*, fixed emacs local variable 'end:', style fix (Michal) Changes from v3: - remove header in dom0less-build.c (Michal) Changes from v2: - move allocate_bank_memory back in domain_build.c, remove header from dom0less-build.c. --- xen/arch/arm/Makefile | 1 + xen/arch/arm/dom0less-build.c | 1018 +++++++++++++++++ xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 1265 +++------------------ xen/arch/arm/include/asm/dom0less-build.h | 20 + xen/arch/arm/include/asm/domain_build.h | 60 + xen/arch/arm/include/asm/setup.h | 1 - xen/arch/arm/setup.c | 33 +- 7 files changed, 1240 insertions(+), 1158 deletions(-) create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/dom0less-build.c create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/include/asm/dom0less-build.h[...]diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/dom0less-build.h b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/dom0less-build.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..81446cbd8bf3 --- /dev/null +++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/dom0less-build.h @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ + +#ifndef __ASM_DOM0LESS_BUILD_H_ +#define __ASM_DOM0LESS_BUILD_H_ + +#include <asm/kernel.h>No need for this include, especially if you are removing it in the subsequent patch. Are you suggesting that this patch builds without including asm/kernel.h? This could be done on commit (+ there is a conflcit between your series and Henry's mmu/mpu split) While I am in general happy to handle some changes on commit, I don't want to solve conflict between series. One will have to rebase on top of the others. I suggest that this is just rebased on top of Henry, purely because I will likely commit it today or tomorrow. Cheers, -- Julien Grall
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |