[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [XEN PATCH] x86/guest_walk: address violations of MISRA C:2012 Rule 8.3
On 28/11/23 14:00, Jan Beulich wrote: On 28.11.2023 10:46, Federico Serafini wrote:Uniform declaration and definition of guest_walk_tables() using parameter name "pfec_walk": this name highlights the connection with PFEC_* constants and it is consistent with the use of the parameter within function body. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Federico Serafini <federico.serafini@xxxxxxxxxxx>I'm curious what other x86 maintainers think. I for one don't like this, but not enough to object if others are happy. That said, there was earlier discussion (and perhaps even a patch), yet without a reference I don't think I can locate this among all the Misra bits and pieces. The last thread about guest_walk_tables(): https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2023-10/msg02055.html Do you have any suggestions on how to handle this? -- Federico Serafini, M.Sc. Software Engineer, BUGSENG (http://bugseng.com)
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |