[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [XEN PATCH] x86/guest_walk: address violations of MISRA C:2012 Rule 8.3
- To: Federico Serafini <federico.serafini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 14:46:03 +0100
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=HIjYccPsnPUNl7/NLjTIC8OH04miJyE40ZgeRxx9yAM=; b=hg1UtGmDY/fapeqzU7U0es/Fru9fXvjl9VbxWPvNCo+pwU3IVpCDT+7g36/d1vbSBY+6oL/VVryZB0b0mkt/tWegGtJz5YFTQCog3vQ85qv3Gm1twttBivG7VwSIoMWNYRKMYMUZtlUZpyY+fUovr9XN7KdHGjEqztaabV5WPnFxcE3erU+mV6iL11S9jxblBnNrkCUsSObobfevT0q1mVxLuab+7kffQnf3ePFzKfENzCygPptf3qTu0aFe3xNNPmwfIP4azIV052FHgMs9qKIsN8NjXxvKO/PCzzJud+L1uQguHxEj9GDGX8YcGvd6YkjQhUZRzXsSgleuEIq8hA==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=CV+lzNWAY9BeAK2aJzj5oZfKdirNZ2QGV3rAV1zLetxxjYsj94V/KnsAFw12Vofz1DCvwszX5Dffqni5vsd/Yz26V/HpezOjf5XR6ETd+Y0BhM/2htSAif6gEsoHoFY/F7RmNk3ROliqeSMaAMkBnVSrzT7eO7pf7KI9IBVSPTH/hzQvntyELU8PWOd4Bdio6LSsqSudo1Rx/B/QBKd4SxHYGlLds4pwGviSlZI2juEFz3IrzPjls0qHrCvx1Qq5hURS9U4ZqtLvkfAFE0dJnyy8MQnPZLLrLgXWCtz0e/40B2D6h6960hCDneFlB8nd5xJOQX6VznVGYbt9iqF/2Q==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
- Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
- Cc: consulting@xxxxxxxxxxx, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 13:46:09 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 28.11.2023 14:11, Federico Serafini wrote:
> On 28/11/23 14:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 28.11.2023 10:46, Federico Serafini wrote:
>>> Uniform declaration and definition of guest_walk_tables() using
>>> parameter name "pfec_walk":
>>> this name highlights the connection with PFEC_* constants and it is
>>> consistent with the use of the parameter within function body.
>>> No functional change.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Federico Serafini <federico.serafini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> I'm curious what other x86 maintainers think. I for one don't like this,
>> but not enough to object if others are happy. That said, there was earlier
>> discussion (and perhaps even a patch), yet without a reference I don't
>> think I can locate this among all the Misra bits and pieces.
>>
>
> The last thread about guest_walk_tables():
>
> https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2023-10/msg02055.html
>
> Do you have any suggestions on how to handle this?
This simply will need solving - see my reply to Andrew sent a minute ago.
Personally the best route I would see is to leave things as they are for
now, hoping that Andrew's indicated code change will arrive in not too
distant a future.
Jan
|
