[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [v3] x86/xen: Add some null pointer checking to smp.c
- To: Kunwu Chan <chentao@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jürgen Groß <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, x86@xxxxxxxxxx
- From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 10:50:23 +0100
- Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@xxxxxxxxx>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 09:50:49 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
- Ui-outboundreport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:yEsnbDcYv3s=;ZPb2Mu+H2XGola6RbrIcyQWyz/T ok93+jBiDKnY1DDXbD0Zifx5nXuoctjgIftPZMgZIr6+J0Ok/V4IQWfIX3rww8eDuhSWmqlvK 9qJflq3k1x97bT/azeoHOkoWJzI8tXhkHDYdN+ev96ILzZ9EL/wY5GeaUIcQHlekUDOjpfyTR OrGxEC3jyfaeGjdDH8Gn9CeDy27YGgHXSOrT+eHHQj77p6Gp0wzaPxB2+rW8TJ2ff2aRsw6aY pXIS+5vkwsSPVKxG5GjojJuUvcZl5XVGkNMAQgqX6BqSFIo/GXB/kqFgNwSgNbMM/p0DNdoun iaqRQcsiwb/XbIrR7D6zSTkMayqKL86oxZSEbdlX3qNfUOfYRF2wgoQhOxv0lHiPEm/itrbso tB7NEyziFnGFmr93Zee7Z9dOaTLbAGuZ/IIHTnsRhvShgIoqHO1fEo4Z5FolxJahE+tmdfxP3 1opwbsVgSPUTIONZ5Zmwx62rBUYhcvY/vd2w1paAXsD9dE9qBA8O4E4+TLxuUFrUVwpSf63tT RKyImNKQvIJMqAmltIcOcrgQpf/85/YxZCnfNsleS1TWANHUv87awcKOhicDB+6uzzTABEHaX V9ikk5FvhrtGe6B5f/8qrrzmW/rqFlbbIEk/T3zgJvWuLVL4Hm39kHppviwwcqh3hQAwRSuNW Q7B6/h7M+ykbB2NgaxDQKF6DqccJHP1nGAgz4J/5dqXsHJA7/VR4g/gVk+U1eJbX+A6hhlNeH h+XVBcSG7JPULvFvS99MaPwQK038pKGKeS8Fzu030ExOECSB2qT8UcQCnl3MwgRb/TWfU+pJu V8GAGqQuivpqsX0lj4ceZ5RV8s9BC1V4i1m/BNBYbwiddhzLYE//O2Hp0ptm32iebTaCGkpWr qBBVRgCm3h4iXgOrInS6rrAS/SDpbOsiCBz/oZkvu8TtRs9zrtkFfHsozotb0ujHHHsj9xzs1 GH3CTA==
>> How do you think about to refer to the function name
>> instead of the file name in the patch subject?
>>
> The main goal is to assign a errno to rc. So use 'fail_mem is good to
> understand.
You responded with information which can fit to the patch body.
How do you think about consequences for a subject variant like the following?
x86/xen: Add some null pointer checks in xen_smp_intr_init()
Regards,
Markus
|
