[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH for-4.19? v4 4/6] x86: Make the maximum number of altp2m views configurable


  • To: Petr Beneš <w1benny@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 12:59:39 +0200
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Tamas K Lengyel <tamas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexandru Isaila <aisaila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Petre Pircalabu <ppircalabu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 21 May 2024 11:00:03 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 18.05.2024 13:02, Petr Beneš wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> @@ -685,6 +685,18 @@ int arch_sanitise_domain_config(struct 
> xen_domctl_createdomain *config)
>          return -EINVAL;
>      }
> 
> +    if ( config->nr_altp2m && !hvm_altp2m_supported() )
> +    {
> +        dprintk(XENLOG_INFO, "altp2m requested but not available\n");
> +        return -EINVAL;
> +    }
> +
> +    if ( config->nr_altp2m > MAX_EPTP )

The compared entities don't really fit together. I think we want a new
MAX_NR_ALTP2M, which - for the time being - could simply be

#define MAX_NR_ALTP2M MAX_EPTP

in the header. That would then be a suitable replacement for the
min(ARRAY_SIZE(d->arch.altp2m_p2m), MAX_EPTP) that you're adjusting
elsewhere. Which however raises the question whether in EPT-specific
code the min() wouldn't better survive, as min(d->nr_altp2m, MAX_EPTP).

> @@ -5228,7 +5234,7 @@ void hvm_fast_singlestep(struct vcpu *v, uint16_t 
> p2midx)
>      if ( !hvm_is_singlestep_supported() )
>          return;
> 
> -    if ( p2midx >= MAX_ALTP2M )
> +    if ( p2midx >= v->domain->nr_altp2m )
>          return;

You don't introduce a new local variable here. I'd like to ask that you also
don't ...

> @@ -403,12 +403,12 @@ long p2m_set_mem_access_multi(struct domain *d,
>      /* altp2m view 0 is treated as the hostp2m */
>      if ( altp2m_idx )
>      {
> -        if ( altp2m_idx >= min(ARRAY_SIZE(d->arch.altp2m_p2m), MAX_EPTP) ||
> -             d->arch.altp2m_eptp[array_index_nospec(altp2m_idx, MAX_EPTP)] ==
> -             mfn_x(INVALID_MFN) )
> +        if ( altp2m_idx >= d->nr_altp2m ||
> +             d->arch.altp2m_eptp[array_index_nospec(altp2m_idx, 
> d->nr_altp2m)]
> +             == mfn_x(INVALID_MFN) )

Please don't break previously correct style: Binary operators (here: == )
belong onto the end of the earlier line. That'll render the line too long
again, but you want to deal with that e.g. thus:

             d->arch.altp2m_eptp[array_index_nospec(altp2m_idx,
                                                    d->nr_altp2m)] ==
             mfn_x(INVALID_MFN) )

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.