[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [XEN PATCH v5 4/7] xen/arm: allow dynamically assigned SGI handlers


  • To: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 14:12:06 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=2; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 63.35.35.123) smtp.rcpttodomain=lists.xenproject.org smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=arm.com; arc=pass (0 oda=1 ltdi=1 spf=[1,1,smtp.mailfrom=arm.com] dkim=[1,1,header.d=arm.com] dmarc=[1,1,header.from=arm.com])
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass header.d=arm.com; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=jInNIhdvRlovQ+I9As8WX1J+NR9g5ZKOmf2Zxb/tb9c=; b=Yy/Li4RyH2H2RrN8TRbwa6eWfiG8uiiiLHEaQGzN7j03N/u6XFq7MdlXHyhSDYHsEEI0oaXJgyRZczGoXiUaqK/0cLnz7Q1sFDOJoDuiNiD8TVVP6jt8liqlv++soVeuRmGsFaqHsdbczGp7eqhq2/8rpE7ifh15j6RBfDDB+0zz4373+Aovb4xDLfE7jHCdswOd1w05P+4MzJfwlEBYBPIXkZsvEYT4QBXNxR+EEQoi7ralB/PYSUc4orTLWuIWGRM9FGUXsfZ1nbEry2MJNC/oDe0yk+QgITKpAWPXKMADuJ+lmnXi1c7rOOjj+q5hNIH2yhOvLfAkoG1qJzfGZw==
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=jInNIhdvRlovQ+I9As8WX1J+NR9g5ZKOmf2Zxb/tb9c=; b=eGr9aataHBGBnt/LNaQ1IzeDpxrItuNYnm7p1I4u+sYaXVFRkJPUvbAF1gXQvJB4M+uIW/zmHqP5PG2pP3H3czMStcySnecWAYWd10RuzY8jjmVagMT3gKf8R0IqZdjK2/mxUZfO/kTY8j7/6kLkQPa7AlyQ7pg7QwTqBIB9hF2FWk0Crs8DbiAD1DKkFz20GI4gjmIGbVzvwbOFu3GXUbNiU/O7/BRM13URs/jlK2NwjX3ECtThWN9mTydF3AgCdOedPUp0zP3g5ULfFODIDIFROB5+m396l9KQZyhZW9Zd06JJinFjN12avf6WQnn5Yb+crpSSI4aOUsfQXFtknQ==
  • Arc-seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=pass; b=V8N7X9cXprRFcQgodZTZWm/0hNoL6I9VkJ4J4o/TCOD47QIZNhudypPbmuSPzLhcpXAFwsdDI0AQzsMEWSXR54vZp+QnPfj+pAJpYiP98F0rrAVbbOjrjCjKJQuQMx62ScV6VKB26drG+/+Bo9kK76MhE8uy7Mj0SY1s+uF+P6aWybW94SUVEpTbUSaXQvxyP7PrqbwP/FzrQQc2DQWA22EYdJUnEqP76FDfcng0G8xoZ7VvH6DhooygvUkayuIeznmMLmSk94KsxhGgOU+q82qcmfoWC2VrmTtx6Tw3/fHCwMNEZIViZwA21kKzqD8DOoXXOv66sA3mADtsbaYQLg==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=NbhycE7XLPSn4NkZeG+yQQDP/U9FGBViiIz+QtT5uSwepzVoC9dPvIEUsMys8mSbEQ3hq5r9K/MoGngIDVGVwn00MMIuIntv5i3DESfHpnwalkI/CBO+88u85qvhr/OFNPw0HhFB5YmgbWC2RfNZFfM1f8oeW0wVjzxXAKj2xo+NOetOUUVmxjhRJ46HX3/sLGxRse7t9hQZEW7CBGBoTz2O1gG0a9oz2nkPuV7sz73aN6PDpLv2yNAuontGR2mntfaQO64gUmsaGYGfcswU6kOa/CZSRKAtpD3u0dSee/Id7mLWdcKs7vKW9OXvUkBQeUnxGkXFLmf0QqKdoTwK9A==
  • Authentication-results-original: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
  • Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "patches@xxxxxxxxxx" <patches@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 31 May 2024 14:12:39 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
  • Nodisclaimer: true
  • Original-authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
  • Thread-index: AQHasZmDYpRVB5hNBU2Zi0KwxSKfZbGxZckA
  • Thread-topic: [XEN PATCH v5 4/7] xen/arm: allow dynamically assigned SGI handlers

Hi Jens,

> On 29 May 2024, at 09:25, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Updates so request_irq() can be used with a dynamically assigned SGI irq
> as input. This prepares for a later patch where an FF-A schedule
> receiver interrupt handler is installed for an SGI generated by the
> secure world.
> 
> From the Arm Base System Architecture v1.0C [1]:
> "The system shall implement at least eight Non-secure SGIs, assigned to
> interrupt IDs 0-7."
> 
> gic_route_irq_to_xen() don't gic_set_irq_type() for SGIs since they are
> always edge triggered.
> 
> gic_interrupt() is updated to route the dynamically assigned SGIs to
> do_IRQ() instead of do_sgi(). The latter still handles the statically
> assigned SGI handlers like for instance GIC_SGI_CALL_FUNCTION.
> 
> [1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0094/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx>

Cheers
Bertrand




 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.